Re: [PATCH] dax, pmem: add support for msync
From: Boaz Harrosh
Date: Wed Sep 02 2015 - 11:18:16 EST
On 09/02/2015 05:23 PM, Dave Hansen wrote:
> I'd be curious what the cost is in practice. Do you have any actual
> numbers of the cost of doing it this way?
> Even if the instruction is a "noop", I'd really expect the overhead to
> really add up for a tens-of-gigabytes mapping, no matter how much the
> CPU optimizes it.
What tens-of-gigabytes mapping? I have yet to encounter an application
that does that. Our tests show that usually the mmaps are small.
I can send you a micro benchmark results of an mmap vs direct-io random
write. Our code will jump over holes in the file BTW, but I'll ask to also
run it with falloc that will make all blocks allocated.
Give me a few days to collect this.
I guess one optimization we should do is jump over holes and zero-extents.
This will save the case of a mostly sparse very big file.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/