On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 5:01 PM, Daniel Drake <drake@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi,Thanks, Daniel, this is indeed really annoying and worth looking into.
Working with a sample for a new laptop based on Intel Skylake, the
kernel logs are full of these messages:
pcieport 0000:00:1c.5: AER: Corrected error received: id=00e5
pcieport 0000:00:1c.5: PCIe Bus Error: severity=Corrected,
type=Physical Layer, id=00e5(Receiver ID)
pcieport 0000:00:1c.5: device [8086:9d15] error status/mask=00000001/00002000
pcieport 0000:00:1c.5: [ 0] Receiver Error (First)
pcieport 0000:00:1c.5: AER: Corrected error received: id=00e5
pcieport 0000:00:1c.5: PCIe Bus Error: severity=Corrected,
type=Physical Layer, id=00e5(Receiver ID)
pcieport 0000:00:1c.5: device [8086:9d15] error status/mask=00000001/00002000
pcieport 0000:00:1c.5: [ 0] Receiver Error (First)
pcieport 0000:00:1c.5: AER: Corrected error received: id=00e5
pcieport 0000:00:1c.5: can't find device of ID00e5
Reproduced on 4.2 and on linus master as of today, using x86_64_defconfig.
Apart from the log spam, there is no user-visible effect that I'm
aware of. Booting with pci=nomsi makes the messages go away.
Any thoughts, is this something worth looking into in more detail?
full dmesg: https://gist.github.com/dsd/1d7f738e917465edf2ae
lspci dump: https://gist.github.com/dsd/dc2481d64aadd520b0b3
Do you happen to know whether it's a regression? We haven't changed
much in AER recently, but it's possible we broke something.
Even if it's not a regression, the output seems a bit wordy and redundant.
Bjorn