Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] regulator: Fix pbias regulator enable
From: Kishon Vijay Abraham I
Date: Thu Sep 03 2015 - 05:23:14 EST
On Thursday 03 September 2015 01:09 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On 3 September 2015 at 08:50, Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@xxxxxx> wrote:
>> vsel_reg and enable_reg of the pbias regulator descriptor should actually
>> have the offset from syscon.
>> However after
>> "ARM: dts: <platform>: add minimal l4 bus layout with control module
>> vsel_reg and enable_reg started to have the absolute address because
>> of address translation that happens due to pbias node made as the
>> child node of syscon. This breaks the pbias regulator enable.
>> This series adds the 'offset' to be populated in vsel_reg and enable_reg
>> in the pbias driver itself.
>> Changes from v1:
>> *) Fixed Tony's review comments on adding a 'comment' for adding offset in
>> the driver and adding a warning for using platform_get_resource.
>> *) Added Tony's Acked-by.
>> Tested these patches against mmc -next in omap4 panda, omap3 beagle xm,
>> dra72 and omap5 uevm
>> Kishon Vijay Abraham I (6):
>> regulator: pbias: program pbias register offset in pbias driver
>> ARM: dts: dra7: use "ti,pbias-dra7" compatible string for pbias
>> ARM: dts: omap243x: use "ti,pbias-omap2" compatible string for pbias
>> ARM: dts: omap3: use "ti,pbias-omap3" compatible string for pbias
>> ARM: dts: omap4: use "ti,pbias-omap4" compatible string for pbias
>> ARM: dts: omap5: use "ti,pbias-omap5" compatible string for pbias
>> .../bindings/regulator/pbias-regulator.txt | 7 ++-
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/dra7.dtsi | 2 +-
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/omap2430.dtsi | 2 +-
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3.dtsi | 2 +-
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/omap4.dtsi | 2 +-
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5.dtsi | 2 +-
>> drivers/regulator/pbias-regulator.c | 56 +++++++++++++++++---
>> 7 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> I have recently queued another patchset  for the mmc omap driver
> for 4.3 through my mmc tree for which Olof Johansson reported a
> regression  for Panda ES with multi_v7_defconfig.
I generally perform my tests with omap2plus_defconfig and without this
series MMC doesn't work with omap2plus_defconfig.
> Kishon, could you please clarify if $subject patchset solves that
> regression reported by Olof? Or perhaps Olof can run a test?
Just checked multi_v7_defconfig and this series is definitely required
to get MMC working. But we also have to enable 'CONFIG_REGULATOR_PBIAS'
which is not enabled by default in multi_v7_defconfig.
So we should have a patch to enable 'CONFIG_REGULATOR_PBIAS' in
multi_v7_defconfig to completely solve the problem reported by Olof.
I'll prepare a patch for multi_v7_defconfig and post it asap.
> Finally, perhaps it's better if we queue this through my mmc tree
> since we would then be able to avoid the regression - if I put
> $subject patchset before , right? Then I need an ack from Mark for
> the regulator patch.
> Please tell me if you guys prefer another way.
> Kind regards
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/