Re: [PATCH] perf stat: fix per-pkg event reporting bug

[Jiri Olsa]

On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 03:17:51PM +0200, Stephane Eranian wrote:

SNIP

> +	/*
> +	 * we do not consider an event that has not run as a good
> +	 * instance to mark a package as used (skip=1). Otherwise
> +	 * we may run into a situation where the first CPU in a package
> +	 * is not running anything, yet the second is, and this function
> +	 * would mark the package as used after the first CPU and would
> +	 * not read the values from the second CPU.
> +	 */
> +	if (!(vals->run && vals->ena))
> +		return 0;
> +
>  	s = cpu_map__get_socket(cpus, cpu);
>  	if (s < 0)
>  		return -1;
> @@ -235,7 +247,7 @@ process_counter_values(struct perf_stat_config *config, struct perf_evsel *evsel
>  	static struct perf_counts_values zero;
>  	bool skip = false;
>  
> -	if (check_per_pkg(evsel, cpu, &skip)) {
> +	if (check_per_pkg(evsel, aggr, cpu, &skip)) {

should we pass 'count' instead o 'aggr' ?

jirka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/