RE: [PATCH perf/core ] perf-probe: Output the result of adding/deleting probe in buildin-probe

From: 平松雅巳 / HIRAMATU，MASAMI
Date: Thu Sep 03 2015 - 21:30:32 EST

Next message: Luis R. Rodriguez: "Re: Fwd: [PATCH] x86: Use larger chunks in mtrr_cleanup"
Previous message: Nicolas Pitre: "Re: [PATCH] ARM: fix bug which lowmem size is limited to 760MB"
In reply to: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo: "Re: [PATCH perf/core ] perf-probe: Output the result of adding/deleting probe in buildin-probe"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [mailto:acme@xxxxxxxxxx]
>
> Em Thu, Sep 03, 2015 at 09:10:35PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu escreveu:
> > Output the normal result of adding/deleting probe in buildin-probe
> > instead of showing it by add/del_perf_probe_events.
> > All the result string is stored into "result" strbuf parameter.
> > If you want to ignore the result string, pass a NULL to the "result".
> > Note that all warning/debug strings are still in the
> > add/del_perf_probe_events.
>
> Please provide the before and after output of the affected tools.
>
> But I'll wait for you to react to Namyung's RFC.

Yeah, I think his series is much better than this add-hoc fix :)
I'll reply him asap.

Thanks!

>
> - Arnaldo
>
> > Suggested-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > tools/perf/builtin-probe.c | 9 +++++++--
> > tools/perf/util/probe-event.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> > tools/perf/util/probe-event.h | 6 ++++--
> > tools/perf/util/probe-file.c | 5 +++--
> > tools/perf/util/probe-file.h | 4 +++-
> > 5 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-probe.c b/tools/perf/builtin-probe.c
> > index b81cec3..d11ad21 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/builtin-probe.c
> > +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-probe.c
> > @@ -402,6 +402,7 @@ __cmd_probe(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix __maybe_unused)
> > "Enable kernel symbol demangling"),
> > OPT_END()
> > };
> > + struct strbuf buf = STRBUF_INIT;
> > int ret;
> >
> > set_option_flag(options, 'a', "add", PARSE_OPT_EXCLUSIVE);
> > @@ -483,7 +484,9 @@ __cmd_probe(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix __maybe_unused)
> > return ret;
> > #endif
> > case 'd':
> > - ret = del_perf_probe_events(params.filter);
> > + ret = del_perf_probe_events(params.filter, &buf);
> > + /* Even if failed, we should show the result first */
> > + pr_info("%s", buf.buf);
> > if (ret < 0) {
> > pr_err_with_code(" Error: Failed to delete events.", ret);
> > return ret;
> > @@ -496,7 +499,9 @@ __cmd_probe(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix __maybe_unused)
> > usage_with_options(probe_usage, options);
> > }
> >
> > - ret = add_perf_probe_events(params.events, params.nevents);
> > + ret = add_perf_probe_events(params.events, params.nevents, &buf);
> > + /* Even if failed, we should show the result first */
> > + pr_info("%s", buf.buf);
> > if (ret < 0) {
> > pr_err_with_code(" Error: Failed to add events.", ret);
> > return ret;
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/probe-event.c b/tools/perf/util/probe-event.c
> > index eb5f18b..1a3ed7c 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/util/probe-event.c
> > +++ b/tools/perf/util/probe-event.c
> > @@ -2395,7 +2395,8 @@ static int probe_trace_event__set_name(struct probe_trace_event *tev,
> >
> > static int __add_probe_trace_events(struct perf_probe_event *pev,
> > struct probe_trace_event *tevs,
> > - int ntevs, bool allow_suffix)
> > + int ntevs, bool allow_suffix,
> > + struct strbuf *buf)
> > {
> > int i, fd, ret;
> > struct probe_trace_event *tev = NULL;
> > @@ -2415,7 +2416,9 @@ static int __add_probe_trace_events(struct perf_probe_event *pev,
> > }
> >
> > ret = 0;
> > - pr_info("Added new event%s\n", (ntevs > 1) ? "s:" : ":");
> > + if (buf)
> > + strbuf_addf(buf, "Added new event%s\n",
> > + (ntevs > 1) ? "s:" : ":");
> > for (i = 0; i < ntevs; i++) {
> > tev = &tevs[i];
> > /* Skip if the symbol is out of .text or blacklisted */
> > @@ -2432,9 +2435,12 @@ static int __add_probe_trace_events(struct perf_probe_event *pev,
> > if (ret < 0)
> > break;
> >
> > - /* We use tev's name for showing new events */
> > - show_perf_probe_event(tev->group, tev->event, pev,
> > - tev->point.module, false);
> > + if (buf) {
> > + /* We use tev's name for showing new events */
> > + perf_probe_event__sprintf(tev->group, tev->event,
> > + pev, tev->point.module, buf);
> > + strbuf_addch(buf, '\n');
> > + }
> > /* Save the last valid name */
> > event = tev->event;
> > group = tev->group;
> > @@ -2451,10 +2457,10 @@ static int __add_probe_trace_events(struct perf_probe_event *pev,
> > warn_uprobe_event_compat(tev);
> >
> > /* Note that it is possible to skip all events because of blacklist */
> > - if (ret >= 0 && event) {
> > + if (ret >= 0 && event && buf) {
> > /* Show how to use the event. */
> > - pr_info("\nYou can now use it in all perf tools, such as:\n\n");
> > - pr_info("\tperf record -e %s:%s -aR sleep 1\n\n", group, event);
> > + strbuf_addf(buf, "\nYou can now use it in all perf tools, such as:\n\n");
> > + strbuf_addf(buf, "\tperf record -e %s:%s -aR sleep 1\n\n", group, event);
> > }
> >
> > strlist__delete(namelist);
> > @@ -2765,7 +2771,8 @@ struct __event_package {
> > int ntevs;
> > };
> >
> > -int add_perf_probe_events(struct perf_probe_event *pevs, int npevs)
> > +int add_perf_probe_events(struct perf_probe_event *pevs, int npevs,
> > + struct strbuf *result)
> > {
> > int i, j, ret;
> > struct __event_package *pkgs;
> > @@ -2802,7 +2809,7 @@ int add_perf_probe_events(struct perf_probe_event *pevs, int npevs)
> > for (i = 0; i < npevs; i++) {
> > ret = __add_probe_trace_events(pkgs[i].pev, pkgs[i].tevs,
> > pkgs[i].ntevs,
> > - probe_conf.force_add);
> > + probe_conf.force_add, result);
> > if (ret < 0)
> > break;
> > }
> > @@ -2819,7 +2826,7 @@ end:
> > return ret;
> > }
> >
> > -int del_perf_probe_events(struct strfilter *filter)
> > +int del_perf_probe_events(struct strfilter *filter, struct strbuf *result)
> > {
> > int ret, ret2, ufd = -1, kfd = -1;
> > char *str = strfilter__string(filter);
> > @@ -2834,11 +2841,11 @@ int del_perf_probe_events(struct strfilter *filter)
> > if (ret < 0)
> > goto out;
> >
> > - ret = probe_file__del_events(kfd, filter);
> > + ret = probe_file__del_events(kfd, filter, result);
> > if (ret < 0 && ret != -ENOENT)
> > goto error;
> >
> > - ret2 = probe_file__del_events(ufd, filter);
> > + ret2 = probe_file__del_events(ufd, filter, result);
> > if (ret2 < 0 && ret2 != -ENOENT) {
> > ret = ret2;
> > goto error;
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/probe-event.h b/tools/perf/util/probe-event.h
> > index 6e7ec68..9855dbf 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/util/probe-event.h
> > +++ b/tools/perf/util/probe-event.h
> > @@ -137,8 +137,10 @@ extern void line_range__clear(struct line_range *lr);
> > /* Initialize line range */
> > extern int line_range__init(struct line_range *lr);
> >
> > -extern int add_perf_probe_events(struct perf_probe_event *pevs, int npevs);
> > -extern int del_perf_probe_events(struct strfilter *filter);
> > +extern int add_perf_probe_events(struct perf_probe_event *pevs, int npevs,
> > + struct strbuf *result);
> > +extern int del_perf_probe_events(struct strfilter *filter,
> > + struct strbuf *result);
> > extern int show_perf_probe_events(struct strfilter *filter);
> > extern int show_line_range(struct line_range *lr, const char *module,
> > bool user);
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/probe-file.c b/tools/perf/util/probe-file.c
> > index bbb2437..e22fa12 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/util/probe-file.c
> > +++ b/tools/perf/util/probe-file.c
> > @@ -267,7 +267,6 @@ static int __del_trace_probe_event(int fd, struct str_node *ent)
> > goto error;
> > }
> >
> > - pr_info("Removed event: %s\n", ent->s);
> > return 0;
> > error:
> > pr_warning("Failed to delete event: %s\n",
> > @@ -275,7 +274,7 @@ error:
> > return ret;
> > }
> >
> > -int probe_file__del_events(int fd, struct strfilter *filter)
> > +int probe_file__del_events(int fd, struct strfilter *filter, struct strbuf *buf)
> > {
> > struct strlist *namelist;
> > struct str_node *ent;
> > @@ -293,6 +292,8 @@ int probe_file__del_events(int fd, struct strfilter *filter)
> > ret = __del_trace_probe_event(fd, ent);
> > if (ret < 0)
> > break;
> > + if (buf)
> > + strbuf_addf(buf, "Removed event: %s\n", ent->s);
> > }
> > }
> > strlist__delete(namelist);
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/probe-file.h b/tools/perf/util/probe-file.h
> > index ada94a2..ee89ef0 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/util/probe-file.h
> > +++ b/tools/perf/util/probe-file.h
> > @@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
> > #ifndef __PROBE_FILE_H
> > #define __PROBE_FILE_H
> >
> > +#include "strbuf.h"
> > #include "strlist.h"
> > #include "strfilter.h"
> > #include "probe-event.h"
> > @@ -13,6 +14,7 @@ int probe_file__open_both(int *kfd, int *ufd, int flag);
> > struct strlist *probe_file__get_namelist(int fd);
> > struct strlist *probe_file__get_rawlist(int fd);
> > int probe_file__add_event(int fd, struct probe_trace_event *tev);
> > -int probe_file__del_events(int fd, struct strfilter *filter);
> > +int probe_file__del_events(int fd, struct strfilter *filter,
> > + struct strbuf *buf);
> >
> > #endif
> >
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Luis R. Rodriguez: "Re: Fwd: [PATCH] x86: Use larger chunks in mtrr_cleanup"
Previous message: Nicolas Pitre: "Re: [PATCH] ARM: fix bug which lowmem size is limited to 760MB"
In reply to: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo: "Re: [PATCH perf/core ] perf-probe: Output the result of adding/deleting probe in buildin-probe"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]