[PATCH 3.16.y-ckt 092/130] target: REPORT LUNS should return LUN 0 even for dynamic ACLs

[Luis Henriques]

3.16.7-ckt17 -stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Roland Dreier <roland@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

commit 9c395170a559d3b23dad100b01fc4a89d661c698 upstream.

If an initiator doesn't have any real LUNs assigned, we should report
LUN 0 and a LUN list length of 1.  Some versions of Solaris at least
go beserk if we report a LUN list length of 0.

Signed-off-by: Roland Dreier <roland@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Bellinger <nab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[ luis: backported to 3.16: adjusted context ]
Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/target/target_core_spc.c | 13 +++++++++----
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/target/target_core_spc.c b/drivers/target/target_core_spc.c
index 2f1c928210b3..a897f4a51a51 100644
--- a/drivers/target/target_core_spc.c
+++ b/drivers/target/target_core_spc.c
@@ -1238,11 +1238,8 @@ sense_reason_t spc_emulate_report_luns(struct se_cmd *cmd)
 	 * coming via a target_core_mod PASSTHROUGH op, and not through
 	 * a $FABRIC_MOD.  In that case, report LUN=0 only.
 	 */
-	if (!sess) {
-		int_to_scsilun(0, (struct scsi_lun *)&buf[offset]);
-		lun_count = 1;
+	if (!sess)
 		goto done;
-	}
 
 	spin_lock_irq(&sess->se_node_acl->device_list_lock);
 	for (i = 0; i < TRANSPORT_MAX_LUNS_PER_TPG; i++) {
@@ -1267,6 +1264,14 @@ sense_reason_t spc_emulate_report_luns(struct se_cmd *cmd)
 	 * See SPC3 r07, page 159.
 	 */
 done:
+	/*
+	 * If no LUNs are accessible, report virtual LUN 0.
+	 */
+	if (lun_count == 0) {
+		int_to_scsilun(0, (struct scsi_lun *)&buf[offset]);
+		lun_count = 1;
+	}
+
 	lun_count *= 8;
 	buf[0] = ((lun_count >> 24) & 0xff);
 	buf[1] = ((lun_count >> 16) & 0xff);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/