[PATCH v1 4/8] rcu: use simple wait queues where possible in rcutree
From: Daniel Wagner
Date: Wed Sep 09 2015 - 08:06:08 EST
From: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
As of commit dae6e64d2bcfd4b06304ab864c7e3a4f6b5fedf4 ("rcu: Introduce
proper blocking to no-CBs kthreads GP waits") the RCU subsystem started
making use of wait queues.
Here we convert all additions of RCU wait queues to use simple wait queues,
since they don't need the extra overhead of the full wait queue features.
Originally this was done for RT kernels[1], since we would get things like...
BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/rtmutex.c:659
in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 1, pid: 8, name: rcu_preempt
Pid: 8, comm: rcu_preempt Not tainted
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff8106c8d0>] __might_sleep+0xd0/0xf0
[<ffffffff817d77b4>] rt_spin_lock+0x24/0x50
[<ffffffff8106fcf6>] __wake_up+0x36/0x70
[<ffffffff810c4542>] rcu_gp_kthread+0x4d2/0x680
[<ffffffff8105f910>] ? __init_waitqueue_head+0x50/0x50
[<ffffffff810c4070>] ? rcu_gp_fqs+0x80/0x80
[<ffffffff8105eabb>] kthread+0xdb/0xe0
[<ffffffff8106b912>] ? finish_task_switch+0x52/0x100
[<ffffffff817e0754>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10
[<ffffffff8105e9e0>] ? __init_kthread_worker+0x60/0x60
[<ffffffff817e0750>] ? gs_change+0xb/0xb
...and hence simple wait queues were deployed on RT out of necessity
(as simple wait uses a raw lock), but mainline might as well take
advantage of the more streamline support as well.
[1] This is a carry forward of work from v3.10-rt; the original conversion
was by Thomas on an earlier -rt version, and Sebastian extended it to
additional post-3.10 added RCU waiters; here I've added a commit log and
unified the RCU changes into one, and uprev'd it to match mainline RCU.
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Wagner <daniel.wagner@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
---
kernel/rcu/tree.c | 13 +++++++------
kernel/rcu/tree.h | 6 +++---
kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h | 18 +++++++++---------
3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index 9f75f25..93d94c7 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -1589,7 +1589,7 @@ static void rcu_gp_kthread_wake(struct rcu_state *rsp)
!READ_ONCE(rsp->gp_flags) ||
!rsp->gp_kthread)
return;
- wake_up(&rsp->gp_wq);
+ swake_up(&rsp->gp_wq);
}
/*
@@ -2057,7 +2057,7 @@ static int __noreturn rcu_gp_kthread(void *arg)
READ_ONCE(rsp->gpnum),
TPS("reqwait"));
rsp->gp_state = RCU_GP_WAIT_GPS;
- wait_event_interruptible(rsp->gp_wq,
+ swait_event_interruptible(rsp->gp_wq,
READ_ONCE(rsp->gp_flags) &
RCU_GP_FLAG_INIT);
rsp->gp_state = RCU_GP_DONE_GPS;
@@ -2087,7 +2087,7 @@ static int __noreturn rcu_gp_kthread(void *arg)
READ_ONCE(rsp->gpnum),
TPS("fqswait"));
rsp->gp_state = RCU_GP_WAIT_FQS;
- ret = wait_event_interruptible_timeout(rsp->gp_wq,
+ ret = swait_event_interruptible_timeout(rsp->gp_wq,
rcu_gp_fqs_check_wake(rsp, &gf), j);
rsp->gp_state = RCU_GP_DOING_FQS;
/* Locking provides needed memory barriers. */
@@ -2210,7 +2210,7 @@ static void rcu_report_qs_rsp(struct rcu_state *rsp, unsigned long flags)
WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_gp_in_progress(rsp));
WRITE_ONCE(rsp->gp_flags, READ_ONCE(rsp->gp_flags) | RCU_GP_FLAG_FQS);
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rcu_get_root(rsp)->lock, flags);
- rcu_gp_kthread_wake(rsp);
+ swake_up(&rsp->gp_wq); /* Memory barrier implied by swake_up() path. */
}
/*
@@ -2871,7 +2871,7 @@ static void force_quiescent_state(struct rcu_state *rsp)
}
WRITE_ONCE(rsp->gp_flags, READ_ONCE(rsp->gp_flags) | RCU_GP_FLAG_FQS);
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rnp_old->lock, flags);
- rcu_gp_kthread_wake(rsp);
+ swake_up(&rsp->gp_wq); /* Memory barrier implied by swake_up() path. */
}
/*
@@ -4173,7 +4173,8 @@ static void __init rcu_init_one(struct rcu_state *rsp,
}
}
- init_waitqueue_head(&rsp->gp_wq);
+ rsp->rda = rda;
+ init_swait_queue_head(&rsp->gp_wq);
rnp = rsp->level[rcu_num_lvls - 1];
for_each_possible_cpu(i) {
while (i > rnp->grphi)
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.h b/kernel/rcu/tree.h
index 2e991f8..3a859d4 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.h
@@ -244,7 +244,7 @@ struct rcu_node {
/* Refused to boost: not sure why, though. */
/* This can happen due to race conditions. */
#ifdef CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU
- wait_queue_head_t nocb_gp_wq[2];
+ struct swait_queue_head nocb_gp_wq[2];
/* Place for rcu_nocb_kthread() to wait GP. */
#endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU */
int need_future_gp[2];
@@ -388,7 +388,7 @@ struct rcu_data {
atomic_long_t nocb_q_count_lazy; /* invocation (all stages). */
struct rcu_head *nocb_follower_head; /* CBs ready to invoke. */
struct rcu_head **nocb_follower_tail;
- wait_queue_head_t nocb_wq; /* For nocb kthreads to sleep on. */
+ struct swait_queue_head nocb_wq; /* For nocb kthreads to sleep on. */
struct task_struct *nocb_kthread;
int nocb_defer_wakeup; /* Defer wakeup of nocb_kthread. */
@@ -475,7 +475,7 @@ struct rcu_state {
unsigned long gpnum; /* Current gp number. */
unsigned long completed; /* # of last completed gp. */
struct task_struct *gp_kthread; /* Task for grace periods. */
- wait_queue_head_t gp_wq; /* Where GP task waits. */
+ struct swait_queue_head gp_wq; /* Where GP task waits. */
short gp_flags; /* Commands for GP task. */
short gp_state; /* GP kthread sleep state. */
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
index b2bf396..545acdf 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
@@ -1779,7 +1779,7 @@ early_param("rcu_nocb_poll", parse_rcu_nocb_poll);
*/
static void rcu_nocb_gp_cleanup(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_node *rnp)
{
- wake_up_all(&rnp->nocb_gp_wq[rnp->completed & 0x1]);
+ swake_up_all(&rnp->nocb_gp_wq[rnp->completed & 0x1]);
}
/*
@@ -1797,8 +1797,8 @@ static void rcu_nocb_gp_set(struct rcu_node *rnp, int nrq)
static void rcu_init_one_nocb(struct rcu_node *rnp)
{
- init_waitqueue_head(&rnp->nocb_gp_wq[0]);
- init_waitqueue_head(&rnp->nocb_gp_wq[1]);
+ init_swait_queue_head(&rnp->nocb_gp_wq[0]);
+ init_swait_queue_head(&rnp->nocb_gp_wq[1]);
}
#ifndef CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU_ALL
@@ -1823,7 +1823,7 @@ static void wake_nocb_leader(struct rcu_data *rdp, bool force)
if (READ_ONCE(rdp_leader->nocb_leader_sleep) || force) {
/* Prior smp_mb__after_atomic() orders against prior enqueue. */
WRITE_ONCE(rdp_leader->nocb_leader_sleep, false);
- wake_up(&rdp_leader->nocb_wq);
+ swake_up(&rdp_leader->nocb_wq);
}
}
@@ -2036,7 +2036,7 @@ static void rcu_nocb_wait_gp(struct rcu_data *rdp)
*/
trace_rcu_future_gp(rnp, rdp, c, TPS("StartWait"));
for (;;) {
- wait_event_interruptible(
+ swait_event_interruptible(
rnp->nocb_gp_wq[c & 0x1],
(d = ULONG_CMP_GE(READ_ONCE(rnp->completed), c)));
if (likely(d))
@@ -2064,7 +2064,7 @@ wait_again:
/* Wait for callbacks to appear. */
if (!rcu_nocb_poll) {
trace_rcu_nocb_wake(my_rdp->rsp->name, my_rdp->cpu, "Sleep");
- wait_event_interruptible(my_rdp->nocb_wq,
+ swait_event_interruptible(my_rdp->nocb_wq,
!READ_ONCE(my_rdp->nocb_leader_sleep));
/* Memory barrier handled by smp_mb() calls below and repoll. */
} else if (firsttime) {
@@ -2139,7 +2139,7 @@ wait_again:
* List was empty, wake up the follower.
* Memory barriers supplied by atomic_long_add().
*/
- wake_up(&rdp->nocb_wq);
+ swake_up(&rdp->nocb_wq);
}
}
@@ -2160,7 +2160,7 @@ static void nocb_follower_wait(struct rcu_data *rdp)
if (!rcu_nocb_poll) {
trace_rcu_nocb_wake(rdp->rsp->name, rdp->cpu,
"FollowerSleep");
- wait_event_interruptible(rdp->nocb_wq,
+ swait_event_interruptible(rdp->nocb_wq,
READ_ONCE(rdp->nocb_follower_head));
} else if (firsttime) {
/* Don't drown trace log with "Poll"! */
@@ -2319,7 +2319,7 @@ void __init rcu_init_nohz(void)
static void __init rcu_boot_init_nocb_percpu_data(struct rcu_data *rdp)
{
rdp->nocb_tail = &rdp->nocb_head;
- init_waitqueue_head(&rdp->nocb_wq);
+ init_swait_queue_head(&rdp->nocb_wq);
rdp->nocb_follower_tail = &rdp->nocb_follower_head;
}
--
2.4.3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/