Re: [PATCH] selftests/seccomp: add support for s390

[Shuah Khan]

On 09/09/2015 10:45 AM, Shuah Khan wrote:
> On 09/09/2015 10:40 AM, Kees Cook wrote:
>> Re-ping. Can someone pull this into their tree?
>>
>> -Kees
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 11:22 AM, Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> This adds support for s390 to the seccomp selftests. Some improvements
>>> were made to enhance the accuracy of failure reporting, and additional
>>> tests were added to validate assumptions about the currently traced
>>> syscall. Also adds early asserts for running on older kernels to avoid
>>> noise when the seccomp syscall is not implemented.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
> 
> 
> Sorry looks like it got lost in my LinuxCon backlog. I will queue it
> up for 4.3-rc1.
> 

Hmm. It doesn't apply to linux-kselftest next. Based on your comment

"This applies on top of -next, following the addition of the powerpc
tests."

This one probably should go through PowerPc tree.

Adding Michael Ellerman to the thread,. Michael! Something
you can take in for 4.3-rc1??

thanks,
-- Shuah



-- 
Shuah Khan
Sr. Linux Kernel Developer
Open Source Innovation Group
Samsung Research America (Silicon Valley)
shuahkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | (970) 217-8978
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/