Re: [PATCH 1/5] virtio-gpu: add virtio_gpu_queue_ctrl_buffer_nolock
From: Gerd Hoffmann
Date: Thu Sep 10 2015 - 10:04:58 EST
On Do, 2015-09-10 at 09:39 +0100, Emil Velikov wrote:
> Hi Gerd,
>
> On 9 September 2015 at 12:42, Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Add virtio_gpu_queue_ctrl_buffer_nolock function, which does the same as
> > virtio_gpu_queue_ctrl_buffer but does not take the virtqueue lock. The
> > caller must hold the lock instead.
> >
> The drm subsystem tends to use *_locked and *_unlocked suffixes. With
> the latter being less common.
> Not a big deal but perhaps you can use one of those for virtio ?
_locked looks correct for this case to me (looking at drm_vm_close +
drm_vm_close_locked to compare). I'll change it.
cheers,
Gerd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/