Re: [PATCH v2] cpufreq: imx: update the clock switch flow to support imx6ul

[Bai Ping]

On 2015/9/11 16:07, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 11-09-15, 23:41, Bai Ping wrote:
> > +	if (of_machine_is_compatible("fsl,imx6ul")) {
> > +		pll2_bus_clk = clk_get(cpu_dev, "pll2_bus");
> > +		secondary_sel_clk = clk_get(cpu_dev, "secondary_sel");
> > +		if (IS_ERR(pll2_bus_clk) || IS_ERR(secondary_sel_clk)) {
> > +			dev_err(cpu_dev, "failed to get clocks specific to imx6ul\n");
> > +			ret = -ENOENT;
> > +			goto put_clk;
> > +		}
> > +	}
> > +
> >   	arm_reg = regulator_get(cpu_dev, "arm");
> >   	pu_reg = regulator_get_optional(cpu_dev, "pu");
> >   	soc_reg = regulator_get(cpu_dev, "soc");
> > @@ -331,6 +365,10 @@ put_clk:
> >   		clk_put(step_clk);
> >   	if (!IS_ERR(pll2_pfd2_396m_clk))
> >   		clk_put(pll2_pfd2_396m_clk);
> > +	if (!IS_ERR(pll2_bus_clk))
> > +		clk_put(pll2_bus_clk);
> > +	if (!IS_ERR(secondary_sel_clk))
> > +		clk_put(secondary_sel_clk);
> >   	of_node_put(np);
> >   	return ret;
> >   }
> As part of good coding practices, you should free resources in the
> reverse order to which they were allocated. The clocks don't follow
> that, but its not a problem with just your patch. That's how it is
> present today. Maybe you can write another patch to fix that.

thanks for your suggestion, I will pay more attention to it in future 
coding.

> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/