Re: [PATCH 3/4] crypto: [sha] glue code for Intel SHA extensions optimized SHA1 & SHA256

[Stephan Mueller]

Am Donnerstag, 10. September 2015, 17:04:31 schrieb Tim Chen:

Hi Tim,
>
>Is there a scenario you can think of
>when a lower performing sha1 transform needs to
>be exposed as a separate driver?

My immediate concern is testing: it is hard to test the individual 
implementations.
>
>Otherwise the glue code logic will only expose the
>best performing one for a cpu and hide the others, which was intentional
>on our part to prevent a lower performing sha from getting used.

Agreed, but the kernel crypto API does that already using the priorities -- 
IMHO a very clean and easy to interpret solution.

Furthermore, if somebody really has a need to not use the fastest HW 
implementation, the kernel crypto API allows him to do that. With the hard-
wired approach in the glue file, you are stuck.


Ciao
Stephan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/