Re: [PATCH 3.10 00/11] 3.10.88-stable review

[Guenter Roeck]

On 09/12/2015 08:55 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 12:56:03PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 03:48:59PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.10.88 release.
> > > There are 11 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > let me know.
> > >
> > > Responses should be made by Sun Sep 13 22:45:08 UTC 2015.
> > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > Compiled and booted on x86_32. No errors in dmesg.
> >
> > cross_compiled with allmodconfig:
> >
> > i386 - pass
> > x86_64 - pass
> > alphacheck - pass
> > arm - pass
> > cris - failed
>
> Is this expected?
I don't test this one.

> > m68k - pass
> > mips - pass
> > powerpc - pass
> > s390 - failed
>
> Is this expected?
Yes.

> > sparc - pass
> > sparc64 - pass
> > tile - failed
> > tilegx - failed

Yes. Looks like it was fixed somewhere between 3.11 and 3.13,
though I did not track down the commit.

> > xtensa - failed

xtensa:allmodconfig builds for me, using my own toolchain.
I see that kind of failure if I build for one endianness,
then for the other, without cleaning up in between.

Guenter

> Are these all new failures?
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/