Re: [RFC 00/13] perf_env/CPU socket reorg/fixes

[Wangnan (F)]

On 2015/9/11 21:03, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 08:20:54PM +0800, Wangnan (F) escreveu:
> > I have tested patch 1 to 10. They looks good to me except patch 4/13. Please
> Ok, I'll take that as a Tested-by: you for 1-10 with 4/13 having the
> checks added, ok?

Sure.

Tested-by: Wang Nan <wangnan0@xxxxxxxxxx> // for patch 1-10 except 4

> > see my email in that thread.
> I add those checks.
>   
> > However, during the testing I found a limitation related to cpu
> > online/offline and 'perf top' that, if I offline most of cores before
> > 'perf top', then online them during 'perf top' running, 'perf top'
> > dooesn't report new CPUs. It still reports the CPUs which are online
> <SNIP>
>   
> > However, It is relatively a rare case. I don't think we have to fix it
> > in this patchset.
> Yup, unrelated to this patchset. But we need to seamlessly support that
> situation, even telling the user that a CPU went offline/online.
>
> - Arnaldo


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/