[PATCH 3.4 131/146] ring-buffer-benchmark: Fix the wrong sched_priority of producer

[lizf]

From: Wang Long <long.wanglong@xxxxxxxxxx>

3.4.109-rc1 review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------


commit 108029323910c5dd1ef8fa2d10da1ce5fbce6e12 upstream.

The producer should be used producer_fifo as its sched_priority,
so correct it.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1433923957-67842-1-git-send-email-long.wanglong@xxxxxxxxxx

Signed-off-by: Wang Long <long.wanglong@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Zefan Li <lizefan@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c
index a5457d5..6ad2e2d 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c
@@ -455,7 +455,7 @@ static int __init ring_buffer_benchmark_init(void)
 
 	if (producer_fifo >= 0) {
 		struct sched_param param = {
-			.sched_priority = consumer_fifo
+			.sched_priority = producer_fifo
 		};
 		sched_setscheduler(producer, SCHED_FIFO, &param);
 	} else
-- 
1.9.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/