Re: [PATCH] mm: memcontrol: fix order calculation in try_charge()

From: Michal Hocko
Date: Tue Sep 15 2015 - 09:56:32 EST


On Tue 15-09-15 14:05:57, Jerome Marchand wrote:
> Since commit <6539cc05386> (mm: memcontrol: fold mem_cgroup_do_charge()),
> the order to pass to mem_cgroup_oom() is calculated by passing the number
> of pages to get_order() instead of the expected size in bytes. AFAICT,
> it only affects the value displayed in the oom warning message.
> This patch fix this.

We haven't noticed that just because the OOM is enabled only for page
faults of order-0 (single page) and get_order work just fine. Thanks for
noticing this. If we ever start triggering OOM on different orders this
would be broken.

> Signed-off-by: Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@xxxxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx>

Btw. a quick git grep shows that at least gart_iommu_init is using
number of pages as well. I haven't checked it does that intentionally,
though.

Thanks!

> ---
> mm/memcontrol.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index 1742a2d..91bf094 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -2032,7 +2032,8 @@ retry:
>
> mem_cgroup_events(mem_over_limit, MEMCG_OOM, 1);
>
> - mem_cgroup_oom(mem_over_limit, gfp_mask, get_order(nr_pages));
> + mem_cgroup_oom(mem_over_limit, gfp_mask,
> + get_order(nr_pages * PAGE_SIZE));
> nomem:
> if (!(gfp_mask & __GFP_NOFAIL))
> return -ENOMEM;
> --
> 1.9.3

--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/