Re: [PATCH 2/5] spi: spi-ti-qspi: add mmap mode read support

From: Vignesh R
Date: Wed Sep 16 2015 - 06:08:21 EST




On 09/14/2015 11:56 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 01:59:59PM +0530, Vignesh R wrote:
>
>> +static int ti_qspi_spi_mtd_mmap_read(struct spi_device *spi,
>> + loff_t from, size_t len,
>> + size_t *retlen, u_char *buf,
>> + u8 read_opcode, u8 addr_width,
>> + u8 dummy_bytes)
>> +{
>> + struct ti_qspi *qspi = spi_master_get_devdata(spi->master);
>> + int ret = 0;
>> +
>> + spi_bus_lock(qspi->master);
>
> I suspect I'm going to see the answer to this in another patch but the
> fact that we're having to take this lock in a driver when it's an op the
> core should be calling.
>

Agree..

>> + ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(qspi->dev);
>> + if (ret < 0) {
>> + dev_err(qspi->dev, "pm_runtime_get_sync() failed\n");
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>
> This would be better outside the lock, there's no need to have the lock
> before we power on and this fixes the fact that you don't release the
> lock here.

Will take care of this in SPI core API

>
>> + memcpy(buf, (__force void *)(qspi->mmap_base + from), len);
>
> The fact that you're having to cast here should be a warning that
> there's someting wrong here. I think you're looking for
> memcpy_fromio().

Ok, will change to memcpy_fromio()

>
>> @@ -479,6 +576,7 @@ static int ti_qspi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> master->setup = ti_qspi_setup;
>> master->auto_runtime_pm = true;
>> master->transfer_one_message = ti_qspi_start_transfer_one;
>> + master->spi_mtd_mmap_read = ti_qspi_spi_mtd_mmap_read;
>> master->dev.of_node = pdev->dev.of_node;
>> master->bits_per_word_mask = SPI_BPW_MASK(32) | SPI_BPW_MASK(16) |
>> SPI_BPW_MASK(8);
>
> Don't we need to map a resource somewhere?
>

The current driver code already does the resource mapping:

res_mmap = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev,
IORESOURCE_MEM, "qspi_mmap");


--
Thanks,
Vignesh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/