Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] irqchip/gic: Convert the GIC driver to ACPI probing

From: Hanjun Guo
Date: Wed Sep 16 2015 - 11:10:23 EST


Hi Marc,

On 09/13/2015 10:02 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
[...]
diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c
index e6b7ed5..8a0b9c3 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c
@@ -41,7 +41,6 @@
#include <linux/irqchip.h>
#include <linux/irqchip/chained_irq.h>
#include <linux/irqchip/arm-gic.h>
-#include <linux/irqchip/arm-gic-acpi.h>

#include <asm/cputype.h>
#include <asm/irq.h>
@@ -1177,7 +1176,7 @@ IRQCHIP_DECLARE(msm_qgic2, "qcom,msm-qgic2", gic_of_init);
#endif

#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
-static phys_addr_t dist_phy_base, cpu_phy_base __initdata;
+static phys_addr_t cpu_phy_base __initdata;

static int __init
gic_acpi_parse_madt_cpu(struct acpi_subtable_header *header,
@@ -1205,60 +1204,56 @@ gic_acpi_parse_madt_cpu(struct acpi_subtable_header *header,
return 0;
}

-static int __init
-gic_acpi_parse_madt_distributor(struct acpi_subtable_header *header,
- const unsigned long end)
+/* The things you have to do to just *count* something... */
+static int __init acpi_dummy_func(struct acpi_subtable_header *header,
+ const unsigned long end)
{
- struct acpi_madt_generic_distributor *dist;
+ return 0;
+}

- dist = (struct acpi_madt_generic_distributor *)header;
+static bool __init acpi_gic_redist_is_present(void)
+{
+ return acpi_table_parse_madt(ACPI_MADT_TYPE_GENERIC_REDISTRIBUTOR,
+ acpi_dummy_func, 0) > 0;
+}

- if (BAD_MADT_ENTRY(dist, end))
- return -EINVAL;
+static bool __init gic_validate_dist(struct acpi_subtable_header *header,
+ struct acpi_probe_entry *ape)
+{
+ struct acpi_madt_generic_distributor *dist;
+ dist = (struct acpi_madt_generic_distributor *)header;

- dist_phy_base = dist->base_address;
- return 0;
+ return (dist->version == ape->driver_data &&
+ (dist->version != ACPI_MADT_GIC_VERSION_NONE ||
+ !acpi_gic_redist_is_present()));


When I was rebasing the GICv3 patches on top of yours, I noticed
that GICv3 will also needs to check the acpi_gic_redist_is_present(),
can we move the code above to some common place, or just leave
the code duplicate but self-contained?

Thanks
Hanjun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/