On 09/17/2015 11:28 AM, Caesar Wang wrote:
Hi Daniel,
å 2015å09æ17æ 17:11, Daniel Lezcano åé:
Hi Caesar,
On 09/17/2015 09:51 AM, Caesar Wang wrote:
Build the arm64 SoCs (e.g.: RK3368) on Rockchip platform,
There are some failure with build up on timer driver for rockchip.
logs:
...
drivers/clocksource/rockchip_timer.c:156:13: error: 'NO_IRQ' undeclared
I think the NO_IRQ definition is missing for ARM64.
Yep, Maybe better to compatible if we don't use the 'NO_IRQ',
Hmm, after digging into drivers/of/irq.c and kernel/irq/irqdomain.c
when there is an error it returns zero. So NO_IRQ and -1 are not correct and on the other side zero can be a valid irq. That sounds a little bit fuzzy to me.
--
/tmp/ccdAnNy5.s:47: Error: missing immediate expression at operand 1 --
`dsb`
...
The problem was different semantics of dsb on btw arm32 and arm64,
Here we can convert the dsb with insteading of dsb(sy).
What happens to ARM32 then ?
The dsb() is ok for ARM32, the ARM32/64 are OK if we can convert the
dsb() to dsb(sy).
I believe all drivers with 'dsb()' have same issue on ARM64 platform.
Meanwhile, I change a bit to make the code more readability for driver
when I check the code style.
Signed-off-by: Caesar Wang <wxt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
--
Thanks,
Caesar