Re: [PATCH 0/2] prepare zbud to be used by zram as underlying allocator

[Vitaly Wool]

On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 1:30 AM, Sergey Senozhatsky
<sergey.senozhatsky.work@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>
> just a side note,
> I'm afraid this is not how it works. numbers go first, to justify
> the patch set.
>

These patches are extension/alignment patches, why would anyone need
to justify that?

But just to help you understand where I am coming from, here are some numbers:
                               zsmalloc   zbud
kswapd_low_wmark_hit_quickly   4513       5696
kswapd_high_wmark_hit_quickly  861        902
allocstall                     2236       1122
pgmigrate_success              78229      31244
compact_stall                  1172       634
compact_fail                   194        95
compact_success                464        210

These are results from an Android device having run 3 'monkey' tests
each 20 minutes, with user switch to guest and back in between.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/