Coccinelle suggests the following patch. But the code is curious. Is the
function expected to always return a failure value?
thanks,
julia
On Thu, 17 Sep 2015, kbuild test robot wrote:
TO: Andrzej Pietrasiewicz <andrzej.p@xxxxxxxxxxx>
CC: kbuild-all@xxxxxx
CC: Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxx>
CC: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
CC: "Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
CC: linux-usb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
CC: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
drivers/usb/gadget/function/uvc_configfs.c:866:5-8: Unneeded variable: "ret". Return "- EINVAL" on line 891
Remove unneeded variable used to store return value.
Generated by: scripts/coccinelle/misc/returnvar.cocci
CC: Andrzej Pietrasiewicz <andrzej.p@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@xxxxxxxxx>
---
Please take the patch only if it's a positive warning. Thanks!
uvc_configfs.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/usb/gadget/function/uvc_configfs.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/function/uvc_configfs.c
@@ -863,7 +863,6 @@ static int uvcg_streaming_header_drop_li
struct uvcg_streaming_header *src_hdr;
struct uvcg_format *target_fmt = NULL;
struct uvcg_format_ptr *format_ptr, *tmp;
- int ret = -EINVAL;
src_hdr = to_uvcg_streaming_header(src);
mutex_lock(su_mutex); /* for navigating configfs hierarchy */
@@ -888,7 +887,7 @@ static int uvcg_streaming_header_drop_li
out:
mutex_unlock(&opts->lock);
mutex_unlock(su_mutex);
- return ret;
+ return -EINVAL;