Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] m68k: Wire up direct ipc calls

[Geert Uytterhoeven]

Hi Andreas,

On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 5:09 PM, Andreas Schwab <schwab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> You mean that we should drop "select ARCH_WANT_IPC_PARSE_VERSION",
>> but we can't do that because an indirect call through sys_ipc() would
>> still need it when dispatching to sys_{sem,shm,msg}ctl()?
>
> Yes.  But all architectures that currently use both sys_ipc and
> ARCH_WANT_IPC_PARSE_VERSION would benefit from decoupling it when they
> add the direct syscalls.

Do we currently have architectures that use both sys_ipc and the direct
syscalls, where keeping ipc_parse_version() in the direct syscalls is required?

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/