Re: [PATCH] genirq: Fix bad IRQ_ONSHOT in forced IRQ setting

[Kohji Okuno]

From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 11:04:23 +0200
> That's weird. The flow is:
> 
> interrupt()
>   mask()
>   ret = primary_handler()
>   if (ret == WAKE_THREAD)
>     wake_thread()
>   else
>     unmask()
> 
> thread_handler()
>   ....
>   unmask()
> 
> So if an interrupt is triggered on the device while the interrupt is
> masked it should be raised again immediately when the unmask happens
> because its level type.
> 
> I'm wondering why that doesn't work.

Yes. I think so. And, I have just found that sdhci_thread_irq() don't
finish in this case. I'm analyzing about this now. But, after I apply
my patch, sdhci_thread_irq() can finish. I will share the result with
you.

Best regards,
 Kohji Okuno
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/