Re: [PATCH 1/3] ASoC: wm0010: disable regulator on error
From: Charles Keepax
Date: Fri Sep 18 2015 - 09:02:33 EST
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 06:12:05PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 12:34:12PM +0100, Charles Keepax wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 04:02:19PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> > > We have done regulator_bulk_enable() while booting the DSP but on the
> > > error exit path we have not disbled it.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > sound/soc/codecs/wm0010.c | 2 --
> > > 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/wm0010.c b/sound/soc/codecs/wm0010.c
> > > index 8434d45..79a7cd3 100644
> > > --- a/sound/soc/codecs/wm0010.c
> > > +++ b/sound/soc/codecs/wm0010.c
> > > @@ -739,8 +739,6 @@ static int wm0010_boot(struct snd_soc_codec *codec)
> > > abort:
> > > /* Put the chip back into reset */
> > > wm0010_halt(codec);
> > > - mutex_unlock(&wm0010->lock);
> > > - return ret;
> >
> > Does wm0010_halt not disable the regulators?
> oops, yes, it does. Sorry I should have seen it before posting.
> patch 2/3 and 3/3 will still apply even if this 1/3 is not applied.
> Should I send a v2 leaving out this patch or is it ok to discard this
> patch while applying?
As long as they apply cleanly I would think its fine to just
leave them as is.
Thanks,
Charles
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/