Re: [PATCH v4 0/2] Fix how CPUs are enumerated when there's more than 255 CPUs
From: Rafael J. Wysocki
Date: Fri Sep 18 2015 - 18:10:41 EST
On Wednesday, September 09, 2015 10:45:48 PM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wednesday, September 09, 2015 03:47:27 PM Lukasz Anaczkowski wrote:
> > This series of patches attempts to fix how CPUs are enumerated by kernel when
> > there's more than 255 of them on single processor.
> > In such case, BIOS may interleave APIC/X2APIC MADT subtables, to obey requirements
> > specified in ACPI spec. Without this patches, kernel then would first enumerate
> > BSP, then X2APIC then APIC, resulting in low APIC IDs to be assigned with high
> > logical IDs and high APIC IDs to be assigned low logical IDs. Biggest consequence
> > of that could be performance penalties due to wrong L2 cache sharing.
> > More details in patch 2/2.
> >
> > Also, simpler approach has been considered, which did not required ACPI parsing
> > interface changes, however it failed to meet requirements. More details can be
> > found here: https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/9/7/285
> >
> > Lukasz Anaczkowski (2):
> > acpi: Added acpi_subtable_proc to ACPI table parsers
> > x86, acpi: Handle apic/x2apic entries in MADT in correct order
> >
> > arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c | 22 +++++++++--
> > drivers/acpi/tables.c | 91 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> > include/linux/acpi.h | 19 ++++++++--
> > 3 files changed, 107 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
>
> OK
>
> Does anyone in the CC have any objections against merging this series?
>
> If not, I'll queue it up as 4.3-rc material.
Well, I had a plan to push this for 4.3-rc2, but then I looked at it again
and realized that I'd like it to stay in linux-next for a couple of weeks
at least as I'm really unsure that it's not going to uncover some nastiness
somewhere.
Which practically means it's now scheduled for v4.4.
Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/