Re: [PATCH v8 2/2] ARM: imx: support suspend states on imx7D

[Shawn Guo]

On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 02:38:39PM +0000, Shenwei Wang wrote:
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Shawn Guo [mailto:shawnguo@xxxxxxxxxx]
> > Sent: 2015å9æ18æ 9:15
> > To: Wang Shenwei-B38339
> > Cc: jason@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Huang Yongcai-B20788;
> > linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Sudeep Holla;
> > tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; shawn.guo@xxxxxxxxxx; linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 2/2] ARM: imx: support suspend states on imx7D
> > 
> > On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 03:01:07PM +0000, Shenwei Wang wrote:
> > > > >  arch/arm/mach-imx/Kconfig        |   1 +
> > > > >  arch/arm/mach-imx/Makefile       |   2 +
> > > > >  arch/arm/mach-imx/common.h       |   4 +
> > > > >  arch/arm/mach-imx/pm-imx7.c      | 917
> > > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > >  arch/arm/mach-imx/suspend-imx7.S | 529 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > >  5 files changed, 1453 insertions(+)
> > > >
> > > > 1453 lines addition to kernel only for i.MX7D suspend support.  Yes,
> > > > this is the way we support suspend on i.MX6, but that's enough, and
> > > > we have to stop this somewhere.  I would ask you to take Sudeep's
> > > > comment and adopt PSCI for i.MX7D power management.
> > >
> > > According to PSCI spec, a supervisory software must be implemented
> > > under either
> > > HVC(EL2) or SMC(EL3) privilege level. I agree that, with this idea, we
> > > could finally move these 1453 lines of codes from kernel into a
> > > platform specific firmware. The problem is we don't have the firmware
> > > so far, and we haven't even had a plan to enable the hypervisor or
> > > secure software on this platform. Because low power consumption is the
> > > key feature of this i.MX7D platform, please continue to consider the current
> > implementation and get this feature supported first.
> > 
> > Can't U-Boot be considered as a firmware to implement PSCI?  I have seen an
> > initial ARMv7 PSCI core support for U-Boot added by Marc Zyngier.
> 
> The current PSCI support in uboot is not complete. It can now support cpuidle, shutdown, 
> and reset. But to support system suspend, there would be a lot more tasks. For example,
> even the current wakeup source management codes will have to move into the firmware 
> too. It is not a short time task. Please continue to consider this platform dependent implementation
> first, meanwhile, we will start to migrate the solution to PSCI. However it will take some time.

I have zero interest to maintain this pile of code in the mainline
kernel.  Take it as a motivation to move to PSCI soon, or you maintain
it on your own as a out-of-tree patch for whatever long time you like.

Shawn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/