On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 02:22:19PM -0400, bfields wrote:Although it could also be equivalent to 0707, or (if bfields is the group name also) 0077, or even (if bfields isn't the group or owner of the file) 0007. Mode equivalence get's even trickier when you throw in permissions just beyond rwx (for example, by Windows standards, the usage of the execute bit on directories is weird (they have a separate permission in their ACE's for directory listing), or by VMS standards, write permission on a directory doesn't mean that you can delete things in it (VMS actually had a separate bit for the delete permission, and even had separate permissions for system access)).
On Sat, Sep 05, 2015 at 12:27:08PM +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
ACLs are considered equivalent to file modes if they only consist of
owner@, group@, and everyone@ entries, the owner@ permissions do not
depend on whether the owner is a member in the owning group, and no
inheritance flags are set. This test is used to avoid storing richacls
if the acl can be computed from the file permission bits.
We're assuming here that it's OK for us to silently rearrange an ACL as
long as the result is still equivalent (in the sense that the permission
algorithm would always produce the same result).
I guess that's OK by me, but it might violate user expectations in some
simple common cases, so may be worth mentioning in documentation
someplace if we don't already.
Also your notion of mode-equivalence here is interesting, it's actually
a strict subset of the ACLs that produce the same permission results as
a mode. (For example, everyone:rwx,bfields:rwx is equivalent to 0777
but won't be considered mode-equivalent by this algorithm.)
I think the choices you've made probably make the most sense, they just
wouldn't have been obvious to me. Anyway, so, OK by me:
Reviewed-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@xxxxxxxxxx>
--b.
--
--b.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/richacl_base.c | 104 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
include/linux/richacl.h | 1 +
2 files changed, 105 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/richacl_base.c b/fs/richacl_base.c
index 3163152..106e988 100644
--- a/fs/richacl_base.c
+++ b/fs/richacl_base.c
@@ -379,3 +379,107 @@ richacl_chmod(struct richacl *acl, mode_t mode)
return clone;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(richacl_chmod);
+
+/**
+ * richacl_equiv_mode - compute the mode equivalent of @acl
+ *
+ * An acl is considered equivalent to a file mode if it only consists of
+ * owner@, group@, and everyone@ entries and the owner@ permissions do not
+ * depend on whether the owner is a member in the owning group.
+ */
+int
+richacl_equiv_mode(const struct richacl *acl, mode_t *mode_p)
+{
+ mode_t mode = *mode_p;
+
+ /*
+ * The RICHACE_DELETE_CHILD flag is meaningless for non-directories, so
+ * we ignore it.
+ */
+ unsigned int x = S_ISDIR(mode) ? 0 : RICHACE_DELETE_CHILD;
+ struct {
+ unsigned int allowed;
+ unsigned int defined; /* allowed or denied */
+ } owner = {
+ .defined = RICHACE_POSIX_ALWAYS_ALLOWED |
+ RICHACE_POSIX_OWNER_ALLOWED | x,
+ }, group = {
+ .defined = RICHACE_POSIX_ALWAYS_ALLOWED | x,
+ }, everyone = {
+ .defined = RICHACE_POSIX_ALWAYS_ALLOWED | x,
+ };
+ const struct richace *ace;
+
+ if (acl->a_flags & ~(RICHACL_WRITE_THROUGH | RICHACL_MASKED))
+ return -1;
+
+ richacl_for_each_entry(ace, acl) {
+ if (ace->e_flags & ~RICHACE_SPECIAL_WHO)
+ return -1;
+
+ if (richace_is_owner(ace) || richace_is_everyone(ace)) {
+ x = ace->e_mask & ~owner.defined;
+ if (richace_is_allow(ace)) {
+ unsigned int group_denied =
+ group.defined & ~group.allowed;
+
+ if (x & group_denied)
+ return -1;
+ owner.allowed |= x;
+ } else /* if (richace_is_deny(ace)) */ {
+ if (x & group.allowed)
+ return -1;
+ }
+ owner.defined |= x;
+
+ if (richace_is_everyone(ace)) {
+ x = ace->e_mask;
+ if (richace_is_allow(ace)) {
+ group.allowed |=
+ x & ~group.defined;
+ everyone.allowed |=
+ x & ~everyone.defined;
+ }
+ group.defined |= x;
+ everyone.defined |= x;
+ }
+ } else if (richace_is_group(ace)) {
+ x = ace->e_mask & ~group.defined;
+ if (richace_is_allow(ace))
+ group.allowed |= x;
+ group.defined |= x;
+ } else
+ return -1;
+ }
+
+ if (group.allowed & ~owner.defined)
+ return -1;
+
+ if (acl->a_flags & RICHACL_MASKED) {
+ if (acl->a_flags & RICHACL_WRITE_THROUGH) {
+ owner.allowed = acl->a_owner_mask;
+ everyone.allowed = acl->a_other_mask;
+ } else {
+ owner.allowed &= acl->a_owner_mask;
+ everyone.allowed &= acl->a_other_mask;
+ }
+ group.allowed &= acl->a_group_mask;
+ }
+
+ mode = (mode & ~S_IRWXUGO) |
+ (richacl_mask_to_mode(owner.allowed) << 6) |
+ (richacl_mask_to_mode(group.allowed) << 3) |
+ richacl_mask_to_mode(everyone.allowed);
+
+ /* Mask flags we can ignore */
+ x = S_ISDIR(mode) ? 0 : RICHACE_DELETE_CHILD;
+
+ if (((richacl_mode_to_mask(mode >> 6) ^ owner.allowed) & ~x) ||
+ ((richacl_mode_to_mask(mode >> 3) ^ group.allowed) & ~x) ||
+ ((richacl_mode_to_mask(mode) ^ everyone.allowed) & ~x))
+ return -1;
+
+ *mode_p = mode;
+ return 0;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(richacl_equiv_mode);
diff --git a/include/linux/richacl.h b/include/linux/richacl.h
index d4a576c..6535ce5 100644
--- a/include/linux/richacl.h
+++ b/include/linux/richacl.h
@@ -304,6 +304,7 @@ extern unsigned int richacl_mode_to_mask(mode_t);
extern unsigned int richacl_want_to_mask(unsigned int);
extern void richacl_compute_max_masks(struct richacl *);
extern struct richacl *richacl_chmod(struct richacl *, mode_t);
+extern int richacl_equiv_mode(const struct richacl *, mode_t *);
/* richacl_inode.c */
extern int richacl_permission(struct inode *, const struct richacl *, int);
--
2.4.3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature