Re: [PATCH 17/17] mfd : ab8500/db8500: fix the abuse of IRQF_NO_SUSPEND

[Sudeep Holla]

On 22/09/15 00:20, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Sep 2015, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>
> > The IRQF_NO_SUSPEND flag is used to identify the interrupts that should
> > be left enabled so as to allow them to work as expected during the
> > suspend-resume cycle, but doesn't guarantee that it will wake the system
> > from a suspended state, enable_irq_wake is recommended to be used for
> > the wakeup.
> >
> > This patch removes the use of IRQF_NO_SUSPEND flags replacing it with
> > enable_irq_wake instead.
> >
> > Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@xxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >   drivers/mfd/ab8500-core.c        | 11 +++++++++--
> >   drivers/mfd/ab8500-debugfs.c     |  2 +-
> >   drivers/mfd/ab8500-gpadc.c       | 15 +++++++++++----
> >   drivers/mfd/db8500-prcmu.c       | 24 +++++++++++++++++-------
> >   drivers/power/ab8500_btemp.c     |  6 ++++--
> >   drivers/power/ab8500_charger.c   |  6 ++++--
> >   drivers/power/ab8500_fg.c        |  9 ++++++---
> >   drivers/thermal/db8500_thermal.c |  5 ++---
> >   drivers/usb/phy/phy-ab8500-usb.c | 10 ++++++----
> >   9 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
>
> Is there a reason for bundling the changes in all of these subsystems
> together into a single patch?

No, I understand this needs to be split. Since I was not 100% confident
about this change, I wanted LinusW to review and provide feedback and
gets things working before I can split this changes. I must have added
RFC, but usually it gets ignored :)

Regards,
Sudeep
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/