Re: [PATCH 3/5] locking/rtmutex: Use acquire/release semantics

[Davidlohr Bueso]

On Tue, 22 Sep 2015, Thomas Gleixner wrote:

> > @@ -121,11 +130,14 @@ static inline bool unlock_rt_mutex_safe(struct rt_mutex *lock)
> >  	 *					lock(wait_lock);
> >  	 *					acquire(lock);
> >  	 */
> > -	return rt_mutex_cmpxchg(lock, owner, NULL);
> > +	return rt_mutex_cmpxchg_acquire(lock, owner, NULL);
>
> Why is this acquire?

Because I am an idiot, that should be a release...

Thanks,
Davidlohr
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/