Re: crisv32 runtime failure in -next due to 'page-flags: define behavior SL*B-related flags on compound pages'

[Paul E. McKenney]

On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 06:16:18PM +0200, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
> > From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2015 17:31:04 +0200
> 
> > On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 08:18:35AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 03:57:06PM +0200, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
> > > > I guess you hit the right spot, but I'd think people would be
> > > > more comfortable with aligning to sizeof (void *).
> > > 
> > > I would indeed prefer sizeof(void *).
> > 
> > Do you prefer to have the attribute set for whole structure or for ->next?
> > I think attribute on ->next is more appropriate from documentation POV.
> 
> Speaking of the documentation POV, I'd recommend adding an
> explanatory comment.  Here's hoping this was obvious! ;)

What Hans-Peter said!  ;-)

							Thanx, Paul

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/