Re: [PATCH] mm/oom_kill.c: don't kill TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE tasks

[Kyle Walker]

On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 7:32 PM, David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I struggle to understand how the approach of randomly continuing to kill
> more and more processes in the hope that it slows down usage of memory
> reserves or that we get lucky is better.

Thank you to one and all for the feedback.

I agree, in lieu of treating TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE tasks as unkillable,
and omitting them from the oom selection process, continuing the
carnage is likely to result in more unpredictable results. At this
time, I believe Oleg's solution of zapping the process memory use
while it sleeps with the fatal signal enroute is ideal.

Kyle Walker
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/