Re: [PATCH] perf probe: Fix module probing with shortname
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Date: Wed Sep 23 2015 - 12:03:29 EST
Em Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 11:49:02PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> Em Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 09:14:44AM +0800, Wangnan (F) escreveu:
> > On 2015/9/22 21:35, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > >Em Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 03:34:32AM +0000, Wang Nan escreveu:
> > >>After commit 3d39ac538629e4f00a6e1c38d46346f1b8e69505 ("perf machine:
> > >>No need to have two DSOs lists"), perf probe with module short name doesn't
> > >>work again. For example:
> > >>
> > >> # lsmod | grep e1000e
> > >> e1000e 233472 0
> > >>
> > >> # cat /proc/modules | grep e1000e
> > >> e1000e 233472 0 - Live 0xffffffffa0073000
> > >>
> > >> # cat /proc/kallsyms | grep '\<e1000e_up\>'
> > >> ffffffffa0093860 t e1000e_up[e1000e]
> > >>
> > >> # perf probe -v -m e1000e --add e1000e_up
> > >> probe-definition(0): e1000e_up
> > >> symbol:e1000e_up file:(null) line:0 offset:0 return:0 lazy:(null)
> > >> 0 arguments
> > >> Failed to find module e1000e.
> > >> Could not open debuginfo. Try to use symbols.
> > >> Looking at the vmlinux_path (7 entries long)
> > >> Using /lib/modules/4.2.0-rc7+/build/vmlinux for symbols
> > >> e1000e_up is out of .text, skip it.
> > >> Error: Failed to add events. Reason: No such file or directory (Code: -2)
> > >>
> > >>This is caused by a misunderstood of dso->kernel in kernel_get_module_dso()
> > >>that, for kernel module, dso->kernel is DSO_TYPE_USER. dso->kernel is DSO_TYPE_KERNEL
> > >>iff dso is vmlinux.
> > >Kernel modules having DSO_TYPE_USER seems to be the bug, no? I'll try to
> > >check that...
> >
> > I also noticed this problem when I working on commit
> > 1f121b03d058dd07199d8924373d3c52a207f63b ("perf tools: Deal with
> > kernel module names in '[]' correctly") ;)
>
> Thanks for working on this, it is an area that needs cleaning up, too
> many ways to say what a dso is, will study your findings and try to come
> up with a patch proposal tomorrow.
>
> - Arnaldo
>
> > It should be bug, but I think fixing it is costy. Here's an
> > assumption that, if dso->kernel
> > is not zero, the dso should be vmlinux (not kernel module):
> >
> > $ grep 'dso.>kernel)' ./tools/perf/ -r
> > ./tools/perf/builtin-inject.c: if (dso->kernel)
> > ./tools/perf/util/symbol.c: if (dso->kernel) {
> > ./tools/perf/util/symbol-elf.c: if (dso->kernel)
> > ./tools/perf/util/symbol-elf.c: if (remap_kernel &&
> > dso->kernel) {
> > ./tools/perf/util/event.c: if (pos->dso->kernel)
> > ./tools/perf/util/probe-event.c: if (dso->kernel)
> > ./tools/perf/util/map.c: * map->dso->kernel) before calling
> > __map__is_{kernel,kmodule}())
> > ./tools/perf/util/map.c: if (!map->dso || !map->dso->kernel) {
> > ./tools/perf/builtin-top.c: if (!map->dso->kernel)
> >
> > So care must be taken.
So, yes, there are multiple uses for this dso->kernel thing, we need to
look at each one and go on clarifying it so that this gets corrected and
sane, but I think we need some helpers to clarify all this, namely:
Adding DSO_TYPE_KMODULE and DSO_TYPE_GUEST_KMODULE, setting
dso->kernel with it when loading host and guest kernel modules and
adding:
bool dso__is_host_kernel(struct dso *dso)
bool dso__is_host_kmodule(struct dso *dso)
bool dso__is_guest_kernel(struct dso *dso)
bool dso__is_guest_kmodule(struct dso *dso)
And then these:
static inline bool dso__is_host_kernel_level(struct dso *dso)
{
return dso__is_host_kernel(dso) || dso__is_host_kmodule(module);
}
static inline bool dso__is_guest_kernel_level(struct dso *dso)
{
return dso__is_guest_kernel(dso) || dso__is_guest_kmodule(module);
}
static inline bool dso__is_kernel_level(struct dso *dso)
{
return dso__is_host_kernel_level(dso) || dso__is_guest_kernel_level(module);
}
static inline bool dso__is_kmodule(struct dso *dso)
{
return dso__is_host_kmodule(dso) || dso__is_guest_kmodule(dso);
}
static inline bool dso__is_kernel(struct dso *dso)
{
return dso__is_host_kernel(dso) || dso__is_guest_kernel(module);
}
Then, looking at where dso->kernel is used now, we use:
tools/perf/builtin-inject.c
static int dso__inject_build_id(struct dso *dso, struct perf_tool *tool,
struct machine *machine)
{
if (dso->kernel)
misc = PERF_RECORD_MISC_KERNEL;
Should use dso__is_host_kernel_level()
And then there is a bug here, where we need to check for
dso__is_guest_kernel_level() as well and if that is true, set misc to
PERF_RECORD_MISC_GUEST_KERNEL, ditto for PERF_RECORD_MISC_GUEST_USER.
---------------------------------------------------------
tools/perf/builtin-top.c: if (!map->dso->kernel)
static int symbol_filter(struct map *map, struct symbol *sym)
{
const char *name = sym->name;
if (!map->dso->kernel)
return 0;
Should use dso__is_kernel(), this is an old filter function dealing
only with vmlinux symbol names.
---------------------------------------------------------
tools/perf/ui/browsers/hists.c
if (asprintf(optstr, "Zoom %s %s DSO",
browser->hists->dso_filter ? "out of" : "into",
dso->kernel ? "the Kernel" : dso->short_name) < 0)
Should use dso__is_host_kernel() and probably should support the guest
cases, with "Guest kernel" and a "Guest module " prefix for guest kernel
modules.
---------------------------------------------------------
int perf_event__synthesize_modules(struct perf_tool *tool,
perf_event__handler_t process,
struct machine *machine)
for (pos = maps__first(maps); pos; pos = map__next(pos)) {
size_t size;
if (pos->dso->kernel)
continue;
This one is ok for non guest stuff, but should be clarified, and guests
should be supported, do that by using:
if (!dso__is_kmodule(dso))
continue;
---------------------------------------------------------
tools/perf/util/map.c
struct map *map__new2(u64 start, struct dso *dso, enum map_type type)
{
struct map *map = calloc(1, (sizeof(*map) +
(dso->kernel ? sizeof(struct kmap) : 0)));
Should use dso__is_kernel(dso)
---------------------------------------------------------
tools/perf/util/map.c
struct kmap *map__kmap(struct map *map)
{
if (!map->dso || !map->dso->kernel) {
pr_err("Internal error: map__kmap with a non-kernel map\n");
Same thing as above with map__new2()
---------------------------------------------------------
tools/perf/util/machine.c
machine__process_kernel_mmap_event()
if (!dso->kernel ||
is_kernel_module(dso->long_name,
PERF_RECORD_MISC_CPUMODE_UNKNOWN))
Should use:
dso__is_kmodule()
And remove that long comment :-)
---------------------------------------------------------
struct dso *machine__findnew_kernel(struct machine *machine, const char *name,
const char *short_name, int dso_type)
{
if (dso != NULL) {
dso__set_short_name(dso, short_name, false);
dso->kernel = dso_type;
This one is ok as it is, checked its callers.
---------------------------------------------------------
tools/perf/util/probe-event.c
static int kernel_get_module_dso(const char *module, struct dso **pdso)
{
if (module) {
list_for_each_entry(dso, &host_machine->dsos.head, node) {
if (!dso->kernel)
continue;
Should use dso__is_kmodule(dso)
---------------------------------------------------------
Looking at the others after lunch, will try to add these step by step so
that we can bisect any thing we miss. But this has to be cleaned
out/clarified, got out of hand.
- Arnaldo
> > Another solution seems simpler: we can redefine the meaning of enum
> > dso_kernel_type like this:
> >
> > # find ./tools/perf/ -type f | xargs -n1 sed -i
> > 's/DSO_TYPE_USER/DSO_TYPE_NOT_VMLINUX/g'
> > # find ./tools/perf/ -type f | xargs -n1 sed -i
> > 's/DSO_TYPE_KERNEL/DSO_TYPE_VMLINUX/g'
> > # find ./tools/perf/ -type f | xargs -n1 sed -i
> > 's/DSO_TYPE_GUEST_KERNEL/DSO_TYPE_GUEST_VMLINUX/g'
> >
> > By fixing the name of DSO_TYPE_USER, kernel module with
> > DSO_TYPE_NOT_VMLINUX seems
> > not so buggy. (Please choose a better name...)
> >
> > What's your opinion?
> >
> > Thank you.
> >
> > >- Arnaldo
> > >
> > >>This patch fix 'perf probe -m' with an ad-hoc way.
> > >>
> > >>After this patch:
> > >>
> > >> # perf probe -v -m e1000e --add e1000e_up
> > >> probe-definition(0): e1000e_up
> > >> symbol:e1000e_up file:(null) line:0 offset:0 return:0 lazy:(null)
> > >> 0 arguments
> > >> Open Debuginfo file: /lib/modules/4.2.0-rc7+/kernel/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/e1000e.ko
> > >> Try to find probe point from debuginfo.
> > >> Matched function: e1000e_up
> > >> Probe point found: e1000e_up+0
> > >> Found 1 probe_trace_events.
> > >> Opening /sys/kernel/debug/tracing//kprobe_events write=1
> > >> Writing event: p:probe/e1000e_up e1000e:e1000e_up+0
> > >> Added new event:
> > >> probe:e1000e_up (on e1000e_up in e1000e)
> > >>
> > >> You can now use it in all perf tools, such as:
> > >>
> > >> perf record -e probe:e1000e_up -aR sleep 1
> > >>
> > >> # perf probe -l
> > >> Failed to find debug information for address ffffffffa0093860
> > >> probe:e1000e_up (on e1000e_up in e1000e)
> > >>
> > >>Signed-off-by: Wang Nan <wangnan0@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > >>Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > >>Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > >>Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > >>Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >>---
> > >>
> > >>I think there may be other places where dso->kernel is misused.
> > >>machine__process_kernel_mmap_event() may be one of them. If I understand
> > >>correctly, 'dso->kernel && is_kernel_module(dso->long_name)' should always
> > >>false theoretically. However, I don't have enough time to check whether that
> > >>code really cause problem.
> > >>
> > >>---
> > >> tools/perf/util/probe-event.c | 2 +-
> > >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >>
> > >>diff --git a/tools/perf/util/probe-event.c b/tools/perf/util/probe-event.c
> > >>index 2b78e8f..c7d6d3d 100644
> > >>--- a/tools/perf/util/probe-event.c
> > >>+++ b/tools/perf/util/probe-event.c
> > >>@@ -270,7 +270,7 @@ static int kernel_get_module_dso(const char *module, struct dso **pdso)
> > >> if (module) {
> > >> list_for_each_entry(dso, &host_machine->dsos.head, node) {
> > >>- if (!dso->kernel)
> > >>+ if (dso->kernel)
> > >> continue;
> > >> if (strncmp(dso->short_name + 1, module,
> > >> dso->short_name_len - 2) == 0)
> > >>--
> > >>1.8.3.4
> >
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/