Re: [PATCH 3/3] page-flags: rectify forward declaration

[Sudip Mukherjee]

> > 
> > Also, I'm finding that the patch series introduces a pretty large
> > bisection hole:
> > 
> > include/linux/page-flags.h: In function 'PageYoung':
> > include/linux/page-flags.h:327: error: implicit declaration of function 'PF_ANY'
> > include/linux/page-flags.h:327: error: invalid type argument of '->' (have 'int')
> > include/linux/page-flags.h:327: error: invalid type argument of '->' (have 'int')
> > 
> > which later gets fixed up by
> > page-flags-rectify-forward-declaration.patch.
> How to test this? Should I apply them on top of v4.2 and bisect? And I
> don't see any relation between the first two patches and this patch of
> the series, then how does it fail in bisect? Am I missing something?
> Confused.. :(
> > 
> > Maybe it's time to do a wholesale refactoring of the patchset?
> If this patch is the first in the series will that help?
> And besides I got the auto mail from you that the patch is applied.
> Now totally confused.. :(
Ohhh ..all the time you were talking about Kirill's patch set and I kept
thinking you are mentioning about this patchset. :)

regards
sudip
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/