Re: [PATCH] sb_edac: fix TAD presence check for sbridge_mci_bind_devs()

[Borislav Petkov]

On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 01:16:01PM -0500, Seth Jennings wrote:
> In 7d375bff, NUM_CHANNELS was changed to 8 and the channel space was
> renumerated to handle EN, EP, and EX configurations.
> 
> The *_mci_bind_devs functions, except for sbridge_mci_bind_devs(), got a
> new device presence check in the form of saw_chan_mask.  However,
> sbridge_mci_bind_devs() still uses the NUM_CHANNELS for loop.
> 
> With the increase in NUM_CHANNELS, this loop fails at index 4 since
> SB only has 4 TADs.  This results in the following error on SB machines:
> 
> EDAC sbridge: Some needed devices are missing
> EDAC sbridge: Couldn't find mci handler
> EDAC sbridge: Couldn't find mci handle
> 
> This patch adapts the saw_chan_mask logic for sbridge_mci_bind_devs() as
> well.
> 
> After this patch:
> 
> EDAC MC0: Giving out device to module sbridge_edac.c controller Sandy Bridge Socket#0: DEV 0000:3f:0e.0 (POLLED)
> EDAC MC1: Giving out device to module sbridge_edac.c controller Sandy Bridge Socket#1: DEV 0000:7f:0e.0 (POLLED)
> 
> Signed-off-by: Seth Jennings <sjenning@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/edac/sb_edac.c | 8 ++++----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

Applied, thanks.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/