[PATCH 4.1 066/159] NFSv4.1: Fix a protocol issue with CLOSE stateids

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

4.1-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

commit 4a1e2feb9d246775dee0f78ed5b18826bae2b1c5 upstream.

According to RFC5661 Section 18.2.4, CLOSE is supposed to return
the zero stateid. This means that nfs_clear_open_stateid_locked()
cannot assume that the result stateid will always match the 'other'
field of the existing open stateid when trying to determine a race
with a parallel OPEN.

Instead, we look at the argument, and check for matches.

Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

---
 fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c |   15 ++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
@@ -1216,6 +1216,7 @@ static void nfs_resync_open_stateid_lock
 }
 
 static void nfs_clear_open_stateid_locked(struct nfs4_state *state,
+		nfs4_stateid *arg_stateid,
 		nfs4_stateid *stateid, fmode_t fmode)
 {
 	clear_bit(NFS_O_RDWR_STATE, &state->flags);
@@ -1234,8 +1235,9 @@ static void nfs_clear_open_stateid_locke
 	if (stateid == NULL)
 		return;
 	/* Handle races with OPEN */
-	if (!nfs4_stateid_match_other(stateid, &state->open_stateid) ||
-	    !nfs4_stateid_is_newer(stateid, &state->open_stateid)) {
+	if (!nfs4_stateid_match_other(arg_stateid, &state->open_stateid) ||
+	    (nfs4_stateid_match_other(stateid, &state->open_stateid) &&
+	    !nfs4_stateid_is_newer(stateid, &state->open_stateid))) {
 		nfs_resync_open_stateid_locked(state);
 		return;
 	}
@@ -1244,10 +1246,12 @@ static void nfs_clear_open_stateid_locke
 	nfs4_stateid_copy(&state->open_stateid, stateid);
 }
 
-static void nfs_clear_open_stateid(struct nfs4_state *state, nfs4_stateid *stateid, fmode_t fmode)
+static void nfs_clear_open_stateid(struct nfs4_state *state,
+	nfs4_stateid *arg_stateid,
+	nfs4_stateid *stateid, fmode_t fmode)
 {
 	write_seqlock(&state->seqlock);
-	nfs_clear_open_stateid_locked(state, stateid, fmode);
+	nfs_clear_open_stateid_locked(state, arg_stateid, stateid, fmode);
 	write_sequnlock(&state->seqlock);
 	if (test_bit(NFS_STATE_RECLAIM_NOGRACE, &state->flags))
 		nfs4_schedule_state_manager(state->owner->so_server->nfs_client);
@@ -2672,7 +2676,8 @@ static void nfs4_close_done(struct rpc_t
 				goto out_release;
 			}
 	}
-	nfs_clear_open_stateid(state, res_stateid, calldata->arg.fmode);
+	nfs_clear_open_stateid(state, &calldata->arg.stateid,
+			res_stateid, calldata->arg.fmode);
 out_release:
 	nfs_release_seqid(calldata->arg.seqid);
 	nfs_refresh_inode(calldata->inode, calldata->res.fattr);


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/