[PATCH 4.2 052/134] powerpc/rtas: Introduce rtas_get_sensor_fast() for IRQ handlers

From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Date: Sat Sep 26 2015 - 18:14:04 EST


4.2-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Thomas Huth <thuth@xxxxxxxxxx>

commit 1c2cb594441d02815d304cccec9742ff5c707495 upstream.

The EPOW interrupt handler uses rtas_get_sensor(), which in turn
uses rtas_busy_delay() to wait for RTAS becoming ready in case it
is necessary. But rtas_busy_delay() is annotated with might_sleep()
and thus may not be used by interrupts handlers like the EPOW handler!
This leads to the following BUG when CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP is
enabled:

BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas.c:496
in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 1, pid: 0, name: swapper/1
CPU: 1 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/1 Not tainted 4.2.0-rc2-thuth #6
Call Trace:
[c00000007ffe7b90] [c000000000807670] dump_stack+0xa0/0xdc (unreliable)
[c00000007ffe7bc0] [c0000000000e1f14] ___might_sleep+0x134/0x180
[c00000007ffe7c20] [c00000000002aec0] rtas_busy_delay+0x30/0xd0
[c00000007ffe7c50] [c00000000002bde4] rtas_get_sensor+0x74/0xe0
[c00000007ffe7ce0] [c000000000083264] ras_epow_interrupt+0x44/0x450
[c00000007ffe7d90] [c000000000120260] handle_irq_event_percpu+0xa0/0x300
[c00000007ffe7e70] [c000000000120524] handle_irq_event+0x64/0xc0
[c00000007ffe7eb0] [c000000000124dbc] handle_fasteoi_irq+0xec/0x260
[c00000007ffe7ef0] [c00000000011f4f0] generic_handle_irq+0x50/0x80
[c00000007ffe7f20] [c000000000010f3c] __do_irq+0x8c/0x200
[c00000007ffe7f90] [c0000000000236cc] call_do_irq+0x14/0x24
[c00000007e6f39e0] [c000000000011144] do_IRQ+0x94/0x110
[c00000007e6f3a30] [c000000000002594] hardware_interrupt_common+0x114/0x180

Fix this issue by introducing a new rtas_get_sensor_fast() function
that does not use rtas_busy_delay() - and thus can only be used for
sensors that do not cause a BUSY condition - known as "fast" sensors.

The EPOW sensor is defined to be "fast" in sPAPR - mpe.

Fixes: 587f83e8dd50 ("powerpc/pseries: Use rtas_get_sensor in RAS code")
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Nathan Fontenot <nfont@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

---
arch/powerpc/include/asm/rtas.h | 1 +
arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/ras.c | 3 ++-
3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/rtas.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/rtas.h
@@ -343,6 +343,7 @@ extern void rtas_power_off(void);
extern void rtas_halt(void);
extern void rtas_os_term(char *str);
extern int rtas_get_sensor(int sensor, int index, int *state);
+extern int rtas_get_sensor_fast(int sensor, int index, int *state);
extern int rtas_get_power_level(int powerdomain, int *level);
extern int rtas_set_power_level(int powerdomain, int level, int *setlevel);
extern bool rtas_indicator_present(int token, int *maxindex);
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas.c
@@ -584,6 +584,23 @@ int rtas_get_sensor(int sensor, int inde
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(rtas_get_sensor);

+int rtas_get_sensor_fast(int sensor, int index, int *state)
+{
+ int token = rtas_token("get-sensor-state");
+ int rc;
+
+ if (token == RTAS_UNKNOWN_SERVICE)
+ return -ENOENT;
+
+ rc = rtas_call(token, 2, 2, state, sensor, index);
+ WARN_ON(rc == RTAS_BUSY || (rc >= RTAS_EXTENDED_DELAY_MIN &&
+ rc <= RTAS_EXTENDED_DELAY_MAX));
+
+ if (rc < 0)
+ return rtas_error_rc(rc);
+ return rc;
+}
+
bool rtas_indicator_present(int token, int *maxindex)
{
int proplen, count, i;
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/ras.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/ras.c
@@ -189,7 +189,8 @@ static irqreturn_t ras_epow_interrupt(in
int state;
int critical;

- status = rtas_get_sensor(EPOW_SENSOR_TOKEN, EPOW_SENSOR_INDEX, &state);
+ status = rtas_get_sensor_fast(EPOW_SENSOR_TOKEN, EPOW_SENSOR_INDEX,
+ &state);

if (state > 3)
critical = 1; /* Time Critical */


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/