Re: [PATCH 2/3] Thermal: handle thermal zone device properly during system sleep

[Javi Merino]

On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 06:48:35AM +0100, Chen Yu wrote:
> From: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Current thermal code does not handle system sleep well because
> 1. the cooling device cooling state may be changed during suspend
> 2. the previous temperature reading becomes invalid after resumed because
>    it is got before system sleep
> 3. updating thermal zone device during suspending/resuming
>    is wrong because some devices may have already been suspended
>    or may have not been resumed.
> 
> Thus, the proper way to do this is to cancel all thermal zone
> device update requirements during suspend/resume, and after all
> the devices have been resumed, reset and update every registered
> thermal zone devices.
> 
> This also fixes a regression introduced by:
> Commit 19593a1fb1f6 ("ACPI / fan: convert to platform driver")
> Because, with above commit applied, all the fan devices are attached
> to the acpi_general_pm_domain, and they are turned on by the pm_domain
> automatically after resume, without the awareness of thermal core.
> 
> CC: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> #3.18+
> Reference: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=78201
> Reference: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91411
> Tested-by: Manuel Krause <manuelkrause@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Tested-by: szegad <szegadlo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Tested-by: prash <prash.n.rao@xxxxxxxxx>
> Tested-by: amish <ammdispose-arch@xxxxxxxxx>
> Tested-by: Matthias <morpheusxyz123@xxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 39 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c b/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c
> index 682bc1e..c3bdb48 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c
> @@ -37,6 +37,7 @@
>  #include <linux/of.h>
>  #include <net/netlink.h>
>  #include <net/genetlink.h>
> +#include <linux/suspend.h>
>  
>  #define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
>  #include <trace/events/thermal.h>
> @@ -59,6 +60,8 @@ static LIST_HEAD(thermal_governor_list);
>  static DEFINE_MUTEX(thermal_list_lock);
>  static DEFINE_MUTEX(thermal_governor_lock);
>  
> +static atomic_t in_suspend;
> +
>  static struct thermal_governor *def_governor;
>  
>  static struct thermal_governor *__find_governor(const char *name)
> @@ -554,6 +557,9 @@ void thermal_zone_device_update(struct thermal_zone_device *tz)
>  {
>  	int count;
>  
> +	if (atomic_read(&in_suspend))
> +		return;
> +
>  	if (!tz->ops->get_temp)
>  		return;
>  
> @@ -2155,6 +2161,36 @@ static void thermal_unregister_governors(void)
>  	thermal_gov_power_allocator_unregister();
>  }
>  
> +static int thermal_pm_notify(struct notifier_block *nb,
> +				unsigned long mode, void *_unused)
> +{
> +	struct thermal_zone_device *tz;
> +
> +	switch (mode) {
> +	case PM_HIBERNATION_PREPARE:
> +	case PM_RESTORE_PREPARE:
> +	case PM_SUSPEND_PREPARE:
> +		atomic_set(&in_suspend, 1);
> +		break;
> +	case PM_POST_HIBERNATION:
> +	case PM_POST_RESTORE:
> +	case PM_POST_SUSPEND:
> +		atomic_set(&in_suspend, 0);
> +		list_for_each_entry(tz, &thermal_tz_list, node) {
> +			thermal_zone_device_reset(tz);
> +			thermal_zone_device_update(tz);
> +		}
> +		break;
> +	default:
> +		break;
> +	}
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static struct notifier_block thermal_pm_nb = {
> +	.notifier_call = thermal_pm_notify,
> +};
> +
>  static int __init thermal_init(void)
>  {
>  	int result;
> @@ -2175,6 +2211,8 @@ static int __init thermal_init(void)
>  	if (result)
>  		goto exit_netlink;
>  
> +	register_pm_notifier(&thermal_pm_nb);

What if register_pm_notifier() fails?  It can't fail now, but that may
in the future.  If we fail to register thermal when we can't register
the genetlink family, maybe we should also fail to register thermal if
we fail to register the pm notifier, don't you think?

Cheers,
Javi

> +
>  	return 0;
>  
>  exit_netlink:
> @@ -2194,6 +2232,7 @@ error:
>  
>  static void __exit thermal_exit(void)
>  {
> +	unregister_pm_notifier(&thermal_pm_nb);
>  	of_thermal_destroy_zones();
>  	genetlink_exit();
>  	class_unregister(&thermal_class);
> -- 
> 1.8.4.2
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/