RE: [PATCH 3/3] Thermal: do thermal zone update after a cooling device registered
From: Chen, Yu C
Date: Mon Sep 28 2015 - 13:52:16 EST
Hi, Javi,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Javi Merino [mailto:javi.merino@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: Monday, September 28, 2015 10:29 PM
> To: Chen, Yu C
> Cc: linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; edubezval@xxxxxxxxx; Zhang, Rui; linux-
> kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] Thermal: do thermal zone update after a cooling
> device registered
>
> On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 06:48:44AM +0100, Chen Yu wrote:
> > From: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@xxxxxxxxx>
> >
> >
>
> I think you need to hold cdev->lock here, to make sure that no thermal zone
> is added or removed from cdev->thermal_instances while you are looping.
>
Ah right, will add. If I add the cdev ->lock here, will there be a AB-BA lock with
thermal_zone_unbind_cooling_device?
>
> Why list_for_each_entry_safe() ? You are not going to remove any entry, so
> you can just use list_for_each_entry()
>
>
> Why is this so complicated? Can't you just do:
>
> list_for_each_entry(pos, &cdev->thermal_instances, cdev_node)
> thermal_zone_device_update(pos->tz);
>
This is an optimization here:
Ignore thermal instance that refers to the same thermal zone in this loop,
this works because bind_cdev() always binds the cooling device to one
thermal zone first, and then binds to the next thermal zone.
Best Regards,
Yu