[RFC][PATCH 03/11] sched: Robustify preemption leak checks

From: Peter Zijlstra
Date: Tue Sep 29 2015 - 05:44:52 EST


When we warn about a preempt_count leak; reset the preempt_count to
the known good value such that the problem does not ripple forward.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
kernel/exit.c | 4 +++-
kernel/sched/core.c | 4 +++-
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/kernel/exit.c
+++ b/kernel/exit.c
@@ -706,10 +706,12 @@ void do_exit(long code)
smp_mb();
raw_spin_unlock_wait(&tsk->pi_lock);

- if (unlikely(in_atomic()))
+ if (unlikely(in_atomic())) {
pr_info("note: %s[%d] exited with preempt_count %d\n",
current->comm, task_pid_nr(current),
preempt_count());
+ preempt_count_set(PREEMPT_ENABLED);
+ }

/* sync mm's RSS info before statistics gathering */
if (tsk->mm)
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -2960,8 +2960,10 @@ static inline void schedule_debug(struct
* schedule() atomically, we ignore that path. Otherwise whine
* if we are scheduling when we should not.
*/
- if (unlikely(in_atomic_preempt_off() && prev->state != TASK_DEAD))
+ if (unlikely(in_atomic_preempt_off() && prev->state != TASK_DEAD)) {
__schedule_bug(prev);
+ preempt_count_set(PREEMPT_DISABLED);
+ }
rcu_sleep_check();

profile_hit(SCHED_PROFILING, __builtin_return_address(0));


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/