Re: [PATCH v2] KVM: nVMX: expose VPID capability to L1

[Wanpeng Li]

On 9/29/15 6:39 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 29/09/2015 04:55, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> > Expose VPID capability to L1.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > v1 -> v2:
> >   * set only VMX_VPID_EXTENT_GLOBAL_CONTEXT_BIT
> Thanks.  I've checked more thoroughly your implementation against the
> SDM now, and there are a few missing things between this patch and the
> one that emulates INVVPID:
>
> - you're not setting bit 32 of the VMX_EPT_VPID_CAP MSR
>
> - you were not checking against the supported types in the
> implementation of the INVVPID instruction
>
> - the memory operand must always be read even if it isn't needed (e.g.,
> for type==global), similar to INVEPT
>
> - for single-context invalidation you're not checking that VPID != 0,
> though in practice that doesn't matter because we don't want to support
> single-context invalidation
>
> - you're always setting the MSR's bits to 1 even if !enable_vpid
>
> At this point it's better if you resend the whole nested VPID
> implementation, i.e. the following five patches:
>
> KVM: VMX: adjust interface to allocate/free_vpid
> KVM: VMX: introduce __vmx_flush_tlb to handle specific vpid
> KVM: nVMX: emulate the INVVPID instruction
> KVM: nVMX: nested VPID emulation
> KVM: nVMX: expose VPID capability to L1
>
> with the above issues fixed.  Please also send kvm-unit-tests patches
> that tests for the error cases.

Ok, I will do this after the vacation(until 10.7) in my country. :-)

Regards,
Wanpeng Li
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/