Re: [PATCH V2 1/3] EDAC, amd64_edac: Extend scrub rate programmability feature for F15hM60h

[Borislav Petkov]

On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 06:43:12AM -0500, Aravind Gopalakrishnan wrote:
> For F15h M60h processor, the scrub rate control register has moved
> to F2 of PCI config space and is at a different offset from
> earlier processors. The minimun recommended scrub rate is also different.
> (Refer D18F2x1c9_dct[1:0][DramScrub] on Fam15hM60h BKDG)
> 
> Modify the set_scrub_rate() and get_scrub_rate() functions so that
> they are aware of these changes.
> 
> Tested on F15hM60h, Fam15h Models 00h-0fh and Fam10h systems and
> it works fine.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Aravind Gopalakrishnan <Aravind.Gopalakrishnan@xxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++----
>  drivers/edac/amd64_edac.h |  2 ++
>  2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

...

> @@ -216,12 +223,17 @@ static int set_scrub_rate(struct mem_ctl_info *mci, u32 bw)
>  
>  	if (pvt->fam == 0xf)
>  		min_scrubrate = 0x0;
> +	else if (pvt->fam == 0x15 && pvt->model == 0x60)
> +		min_scrubrate = 0x6;
>  
>  	/* Erratum #505 */
>  	if (pvt->fam == 0x15 && pvt->model < 0x10)
>  		f15h_select_dct(pvt, 0);
>  
> -	return __set_scrub_rate(pvt->F3, bw, min_scrubrate);
> +	if (pvt->fam == 0x15 && pvt->model == 0x60)
> +		return __set_scrub_rate(pvt, bw, min_scrubrate);
> +
> +	return __set_scrub_rate(pvt, bw, min_scrubrate);

This looks sloppy:

	if (condition)
		return function()
	return function()

I ended up committing the version below. Other two applied too.

---
From: Aravind Gopalakrishnan <Aravind.Gopalakrishnan@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2015 06:43:12 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] EDAC, amd64_edac: Extend scrub rate support to F15hM60h

The scrub rate control register has moved to function 2 in PCI config
space and is at a different offset on family 0x15, models 0x60 and
later. The minimum recommended scrub rate has also changed. (Refer to
D18F2x1c9_dct[1:0][DramScrub] in Fam15hM60h BKDG).

Adjust set_scrub_rate() and get_scrub_rate() functions to accommodate
this.

Tested on F15hM60h, Fam15h, models 00h-0fh and Fam10h systems.

Signed-off-by: Aravind Gopalakrishnan <Aravind.Gopalakrishnan@xxxxxxx>
Cc: linux-edac <linux-edac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1443440593-2316-2-git-send-email-Aravind.Gopalakrishnan@xxxxxxx
[ Cleanup conditionals. ]
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
 drivers/edac/amd64_edac.h |  2 ++
 2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c b/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c
index 73aea40a9c89..ca03a736b106 100644
--- a/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c
+++ b/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c
@@ -173,7 +173,7 @@ static inline int amd64_read_dct_pci_cfg(struct amd64_pvt *pvt, u8 dct,
  * scan the scrub rate mapping table for a close or matching bandwidth value to
  * issue. If requested is too big, then use last maximum value found.
  */
-static int __set_scrub_rate(struct pci_dev *ctl, u32 new_bw, u32 min_rate)
+static int __set_scrub_rate(struct amd64_pvt *pvt, u32 new_bw, u32 min_rate)
 {
 	u32 scrubval;
 	int i;
@@ -201,7 +201,14 @@ static int __set_scrub_rate(struct pci_dev *ctl, u32 new_bw, u32 min_rate)
 
 	scrubval = scrubrates[i].scrubval;
 
-	pci_write_bits32(ctl, SCRCTRL, scrubval, 0x001F);
+	if (pvt->fam == 0x15 && pvt->model == 0x60) {
+		f15h_select_dct(pvt, 0);
+		pci_write_bits32(pvt->F2, F15H_M60H_SCRCTRL, scrubval, 0x001F);
+		f15h_select_dct(pvt, 1);
+		pci_write_bits32(pvt->F2, F15H_M60H_SCRCTRL, scrubval, 0x001F);
+	} else {
+		pci_write_bits32(pvt->F3, SCRCTRL, scrubval, 0x001F);
+	}
 
 	if (scrubval)
 		return scrubrates[i].bandwidth;
@@ -217,11 +224,15 @@ static int set_scrub_rate(struct mem_ctl_info *mci, u32 bw)
 	if (pvt->fam == 0xf)
 		min_scrubrate = 0x0;
 
-	/* Erratum #505 */
-	if (pvt->fam == 0x15 && pvt->model < 0x10)
-		f15h_select_dct(pvt, 0);
+	if (pvt->fam == 0x15) {
+		/* Erratum #505 */
+		if (pvt->model < 0x10)
+			f15h_select_dct(pvt, 0);
 
-	return __set_scrub_rate(pvt->F3, bw, min_scrubrate);
+		if (pvt->model == 0x60)
+			min_scrubrate = 0x6;
+	}
+	return __set_scrub_rate(pvt, bw, min_scrubrate);
 }
 
 static int get_scrub_rate(struct mem_ctl_info *mci)
@@ -230,11 +241,15 @@ static int get_scrub_rate(struct mem_ctl_info *mci)
 	u32 scrubval = 0;
 	int i, retval = -EINVAL;
 
-	/* Erratum #505 */
-	if (pvt->fam == 0x15 && pvt->model < 0x10)
-		f15h_select_dct(pvt, 0);
+	if (pvt->fam == 0x15) {
+		/* Erratum #505 */
+		if (pvt->model < 0x10)
+			f15h_select_dct(pvt, 0);
 
-	amd64_read_pci_cfg(pvt->F3, SCRCTRL, &scrubval);
+		if (pvt->model == 0x60)
+			amd64_read_pci_cfg(pvt->F2, F15H_M60H_SCRCTRL, &scrubval);
+	} else
+		amd64_read_pci_cfg(pvt->F3, SCRCTRL, &scrubval);
 
 	scrubval = scrubval & 0x001F;
 
diff --git a/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.h b/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.h
index 4bdec752d330..971dc12a0a1c 100644
--- a/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.h
+++ b/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.h
@@ -255,6 +255,8 @@
 
 #define DCT_SEL_HI			0x114
 
+#define F15H_M60H_SCRCTRL		0x1C8
+
 /*
  * Function 3 - Misc Control
  */
-- 
2.3.5

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/