Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] PM / sleep: Go direct_complete if driver has no callbacks

[Alan Stern]

On Tue, 29 Sep 2015, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:

> If a suitable prepare callback cannot be found for a given device and
> its driver has no PM callbacks at all, assume that it can go direct to
> complete when the system goes to sleep.
> 
> The reason for this is that there's lots of devices in a system that do
> no PM at all and there's no reason for them to prevent their ancestors
> to do direct_complete if they can support it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

> +void device_check_pm_callbacks(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +	dev->power.no_pm_callbacks =
> +		(!dev->bus || pm_ops_is_empty(dev->bus->pm)) &&
> +		(!dev->class || pm_ops_is_empty(dev->class->pm)) &&
> +		(!dev->type || pm_ops_is_empty(dev->type->pm)) &&
> +		(!dev->pm_domain || pm_ops_is_empty(&dev->pm_domain->ops)) &&
> +		(!dev->driver || pm_ops_is_empty(dev->driver->pm));
> +}

One fairly minor point: You should lock dev->power.lock before setting
this bitfield.  This is because bitfields are not SMP-safe.

Alan Stern

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/