Re: Trivial clocksource driver
From: Måns Rullgård
Date: Tue Sep 29 2015 - 16:18:44 EST
Mason <slash.tmp@xxxxxxx> writes:
> On 29/09/2015 20:32, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> On Tue, 29 Sep 2015, Mason wrote:
>>> I am trying to submit a new ARM port, and Arnd pointed out that the
>>> clocksource code could not live in arch/arm/$PLATFORM, but had to
>>> move to drivers/clocksource (and it had to support DT).
>>> Did I understand correctly? Is this the right place to submit code
>>> as provided below?
>> Yes, drivers/clocksource is the right place. You just need to submit a
>> formal patch, which includes a proper subject line, changelog, plus
>> the necessary Makefile and Kconfig modifications.
> OK, I'll send a formal patch tomorrow.
> There are no Kconfig modifications, is that OK?
Why don't you use my driver? It's even simpler, and it works just fine
on the 87xx chip.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/