On Tuesday 25 August 2015 11:42 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On 25.08.2015 14:47, Marek Szyprowski wrote:Alright.. lets use vbus-supply then.
Hello,This is actually supply for VBUS, not for the phy. Using phy-supply
On 2015-08-21 14:44, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
On Friday 21 August 2015 06:08 PM, Marek Szyprowski wrote:I wanted to make it a bit more descriptive (vbus-supply is rather self
Exynos USB2 PHY has separate power supply, which is usually provided byhow about using phy-supply?
VBUS regulator. This patch adds support for it. VBUS regulator is
optional, to keep compatibility with boards, which have VBUS provided
from some always-on power source.
Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
.../devicetree/bindings/phy/samsung-phy.txt | 3 +++
drivers/phy/phy-samsung-usb2.c | 25
++++++++++++++++++++--
drivers/phy/phy-samsung-usb2.h | 2 ++
3 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/samsung-phy.txt
b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/samsung-phy.txt
index 60c6f2a633e0..0289d3b07853 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/samsung-phy.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/samsung-phy.txt
@@ -44,6 +44,9 @@ Required properties:
- the "ref" clock is used to get the rate of the clock provided
to the
PHY module
+Optional properties:
+- vbus-supply: power-supply phandle for vbus power source
explaining name)
and keep it in line with Exynos usb3-drd phy, which already supports
vbus-supply.
If you think that this is a bad idea, a will use phy-supply then.
would work fine and reduce the size of code... but would be rather a
hacky-use of phy and it could be misleading.
I don't have strong feeling about this, both ideas have its advantages.
If I had to choose than I would like to use vbus-supply because of its
correctness with real-world (this is a VBUS after all).