Re: [PATCHv2 0/3] align zpool/zbud/zsmalloc on the api

From: Minchan Kim
Date: Wed Sep 30 2015 - 04:02:17 EST

Next message: 平松雅巳 / HIRAMATU，MASAMI: "RE: [perf probe] How to ask what variables can be collected at function return?"
Previous message: Vitaly Wool: "Re: [PATCH 0/3] allow zram to use zbud as underlying allocator"
In reply to: Vitaly Wool: "[PATCHv2 3/3] zsmalloc: add compaction callbacks"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hello,

On Sat, Sep 26, 2015 at 10:04:01AM +0200, Vitaly Wool wrote:
> Here comes the second iteration over zpool/zbud/zsmalloc API alignment.
> This time I divide it into three patches: for zpool, for zbud and for zsmalloc :)
> Patches are non-intrusive and do not change any existing functionality. They only
> add up stuff for the alignment purposes.

It exposes new API which needs justification in description.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: 平松雅巳 / HIRAMATU，MASAMI: "RE: [perf probe] How to ask what variables can be collected at function return?"
Previous message: Vitaly Wool: "Re: [PATCH 0/3] allow zram to use zbud as underlying allocator"
In reply to: Vitaly Wool: "[PATCHv2 3/3] zsmalloc: add compaction callbacks"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]