Re: [PATCH 10/12] net: sctp: avoid incorrect time_t use

[Neil Horman]

On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 11:15:20AM -0300, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 09:57:31AM -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 01:26:40PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > We want to avoid using time_t in the kernel because of the y2038
> > > overflow problem. The use in sctp is not for storing seconds at
> > > all, but instead uses microseconds and is passed as 32-bit
> > > on all machines.
> > > 
> > > This patch changes the type to u32, which better fits the use.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: Neil Horman <nhorman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: linux-sctp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > ---
> > >  net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c | 2 +-
> > >  net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c  | 2 +-
> > >  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c b/net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c
> > > index 7954c52e1794..763e06a55155 100644
> > > --- a/net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c
> > > +++ b/net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c
> > > @@ -2494,7 +2494,7 @@ static int sctp_process_param(struct sctp_association *asoc,
> > >  	__u16 sat;
> > >  	int retval = 1;
> > >  	sctp_scope_t scope;
> > > -	time_t stale;
> > > +	u32 stale;
> > >  	struct sctp_af *af;
> > >  	union sctp_addr_param *addr_param;
> > >  	struct sctp_transport *t;
> > > diff --git a/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c b/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c
> > > index d7eaa7354cf7..6f46aa16cb76 100644
> > > --- a/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c
> > > +++ b/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c
> > > @@ -2306,7 +2306,7 @@ static sctp_disposition_t sctp_sf_do_5_2_6_stale(struct net *net,
> > >  						 sctp_cmd_seq_t *commands)
> > >  {
> > >  	struct sctp_chunk *chunk = arg;
> > > -	time_t stale;
> > > +	u32 stale;
> > >  	sctp_cookie_preserve_param_t bht;
> > >  	sctp_errhdr_t *err;
> > >  	struct sctp_chunk *reply;
> > > -- 
> > > 2.1.0.rc2
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > Assignments to this variable use ntohl, won't this change risk overflow?
> > 
> > Neil
> 
> But isn't ntohl always 4 bytes long?
> 
Oh, you might be right. I was thinking it was 8, but I'm wrong

Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

> Marcelo
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sctp" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/