Re: [PATCH 0/2] coredump: make SIGNAL_GROUP_COREDUMP more friendly to oom-killer

From: Tetsuo Handa
Date: Wed Sep 30 2015 - 12:13:02 EST


Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> This patch just makes the SIGNAL_GROUP_COREDUMP check in task_will_free_mem()
> a bit more correct wrt CLONE_VM tasks, nothing more.

OK. Then, that's out of what I can understand. But I wish for
some description to PATCH 2/2 about why to change from
"do { } while_each_thread()" to "for_each_thread() { }"
because they seem to traverse differently.



#define __for_each_thread(signal, t) \
list_for_each_entry_rcu(t, &(signal)->thread_head, thread_node)

#define for_each_thread(p, t) \
__for_each_thread((p)->signal, t)

static inline struct task_struct *next_thread(const struct task_struct *p)
{
return list_entry_rcu(p->thread_group.next,
struct task_struct, thread_group);
}

#define while_each_thread(g, t) \
while ((t = next_thread(t)) != g)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/