Re: [PATCH] watchdog: perform all-CPU backtrace in case of hard lockup
From: Jiri Kosina
Date: Thu Oct 01 2015 - 03:45:25 EST
On Thu, 1 Oct 2015, Aaron Tomlin wrote:
> > + /*
> > + * Perform all-CPU dump only once to avoid multiple hardlockups
> > + * generating interleaving traces
> > + */
> > + if (sysctl_hardlockup_all_cpu_backtrace &&
> > + !test_and_set_bit(0, &hardlockup_allcpu_dumped))
> > + trigger_allbutself_cpu_backtrace();
>
> How does this play when 'softlockup_all_cpu_backtrace' is enabled too?
That should be fine. Worst case scenario is hardlockup and softlockup
trigerring 'in parallel' on different CPUs, and all-cpu backtrace being
triggered twice.
Frankly, I've never seen this happen in practice (hardlockup and
softlockup triggering at different CPUs at the very same time).
We could possibly make a global 'all_cpus_dump_in_progress' flag so that
we guarantee only one stream of dumps, but we'd need to convert everybody
using this facility (e.g. RCU stall detector, and whoever else) to be
aware of it as well, otherwise it wouldn't make too much sense.
Something to add to TODO I guess.
>
> > +
> > + if (hardlockup_panic)
> > + panic("Hard LOCKUP");
> >
> > __this_cpu_write(hard_watchdog_warn, true);
> > return;
>
> This does indeed appear similar to Linus commit ed235875
> ("kernel/watchdog.c: print traces for all cpus on lockup detection");
> albeit for the hardlockup detector.
>
> Looks fine to me. Thanks!
>
> Reviewed-by: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks,
--
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/