Re: [PATCH] x86: uapi: Fix __BITS_PER_LONG for x32

[Ingo Molnar]

* Ben Hutchings <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/bitsperlong.h b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/bitsperlong.h
> index b0ae1c4..217909b 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/bitsperlong.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/bitsperlong.h
> @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
>  #ifndef __ASM_X86_BITSPERLONG_H
>  #define __ASM_X86_BITSPERLONG_H
>  
> -#ifdef __x86_64__
> +#if defined(__x86_64__) && !defined(__ILP32__)
>  # define __BITS_PER_LONG 64

Can we write this as:

   #ifdef __ILP64__

?

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/