Re: [PATCH 1/2] regmap: Allow installing custom reg_update_bits function

[Jon Ringle]

On Thu, 1 Oct 2015, Mark Brown wrote:

> On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 02:33:06AM -0400, jon@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> 
> > @@ -2509,6 +2510,10 @@ static int _regmap_update_bits(struct regmap *map, unsigned int reg,
> >  	int ret;
> >  	unsigned int tmp, orig;
> >  
> > +	if (map->reg_update_bits)
> > +		return map->reg_update_bits(map->bus_context, reg, mask, val,
> > +					    change, force_write);
> > +
> >  	ret = _regmap_read(map, reg, &orig);
> >  	if (ret != 0)
> >  		return ret;
> 
> This completely bypasses and therefore breaks the cache infrastructure.
> 

Hi Mark,

Right after sending the v2 patch, I realized that calling the 
custom reg_update_bits would only be applicable for registers that are 
marked as volatile. Would the following solution be acceptable (it would 
also simplify the regmap_update_bits in the encx24j600 driver):

	if (regmap_volatile(map, reg) && map->reg_update_bits) {
		return map->reg_update_bits(map->bus_context, reg, mask, 
		                            val, change, force_write);
		
The cache state should not matter for volatile registers, right?

-Jon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/