RE: [PATCH] sched: fix task and run queue run_delay inconsistencies

[Meyer, Mike]

> On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 08:37:32AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> > > On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 08:28:41PM +0000, Meyer, Mike wrote:
> 
> It looks like the sites in the wakeup path do indeed not get any additional
> conditionals.
> 
> > > My only comment is I am not sure about the naming of the flag
> > > ENQUEUE_TEMP which implies (to me) the enqueue is temporary which
> > > clearly it isn't.    Maybe something like
> DEQUEUE_MOVE/ENQUEUE_MOVE
> > > would be a bit more descriptive of the use case.
> >
> > Yes, I ran out of creative juices, let me attempt a better name once
> > I've woken up a bit.
> 
> How about DEQUEUE_SAVE, ENQUEUE_RESTORE ? Ideally I'd wrap the whole
> pattern into a helper but C isn't really supportive of pre+post patterns like
> this.

Sounds fine to me!

Thanks again.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/